DOJ-OGR-00005248.jpg
751 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / government motion (case 1:20-cr-00330-ajn)
File Size:
751 KB
Summary
This document is page 3 of a Government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated October 15, 2021. The Government argues that the defense's proposed deadline of November 15, 2021, for filing Rule 412 motions (regarding the admissibility of victims' sexual behavior) is impractical as it conflicts with jury selection and the Thanksgiving holiday. The Government requests an earlier deadline to allow sufficient time for investigation and *in camera* hearings.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | Prosecution/Filer |
Submitting arguments regarding trial deadlines and Rule 412 motions.
|
| Defense | Opposing Party |
Received witness lists and Giglio material; proposing a November 15 deadline for Rule 412 motions.
|
| Victims/Victim Witnesses | Witnesses |
Subject to potential Rule 412 motions; have a right to be heard in in camera hearings.
|
| AJN | Judge (Initials) |
Alison J. Nathan (implied by case number suffix in header).
|
Timeline (3 events)
October 11, 2021
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
District Court for the District of Columbia (cited in US v. Smith).
|
Relationships (2)
Government arguing against Defense's proposed schedule.
Defense may file Rule 412 motions regarding victims' past sexual behavior.
Key Quotes (3)
"The Government respectfully submits that the Court has “good cause” to set an earlier deadline in order to ensure that any issues stemming from Rule 412 litigation are resolved in a timely fashion"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005248.jpg
Quote #1
"Additionally, a deadline of 14 days before trial for the defense’s Rule 412 motion is not practical in light of the trial schedule."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005248.jpg
Quote #2
"Given that there are multiple victim witnesses and the defense has not yet notified the Government whether it intends to make a Rule 412 motion as to one or more than one"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005248.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document