Trove
Sign In Sign Up

defense

Person
Mentions
14
Relationships
0
Events
1
Documents
7
Also known as:
Defense Council Defense Counsel (Thomas) Court and Defense Counsel Defense Counsel (Laura) Counsel for Government and Defense Defense Counsel (Cassidy, Guha, Necheles) Defense Counsel (Jay)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
No relationships found for this entity.
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2020-10-19 N/A Government sends 'preliminary statement of facts' to defense counsel to discuss potential resolut... Email correspondence View

EFTA00027491.pdf

This document is an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the FBI's NY Computer Analysis Response Team (CART) regarding the forensic processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the US Virgin Islands. The correspondence reveals significant friction caused by technical incompatibility between the FBI's forensic tools and the USANYS's 'Relativity' review platform, exacerbated by delays due to COVID-19 and FBI network infrastructure updates. The document lists specific seized hardware (Dell servers, Sony laptops, various hard drives with NYC serial numbers) and concludes with USANYS seeking funding to hire a private vendor (BRG) to expedite the processing because they have lost confidence in the FBI's ability to deliver in a timely manner. While flight records are mentioned as a type of document contained within the evidence (specifically regarding the inability to link attachments to emails), no actual flight logs are present in this document.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00018888.pdf

This document is an email dated November 6, 2021, concerning the transmission of legal discovery material ('3500 material') in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender confirms that files have been uploaded to USAfx for the defense team and that a physical drive will be prepared and sent via FedEx. The email includes several attachments referencing indices, non-testifying witness material, and cover letters.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00021991.jpg

This is the final page (page 15) of a court transcript filed on December 19, 2019, for Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. The judge rules to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act until April 20, 2020, to allow for discovery production and motion preparation. The hearing is adjourned, and the defendants' bail status remains unchanged.

Court transcript / legal filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016480.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. A government prosecutor addresses the Court regarding the potential calling of a rebuttal expert and the logistics of closing arguments, specifically how to present sealed exhibits to the jury without making them public. The speaker emphasizes coordination with the defense to ensure the process runs smoothly.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005596.jpg

This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 384) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The filing outlines the Defense's arguments that the Government failed to identify co-conspirator statements and overwhelmed the defense with document dumps, violating court orders. The Defense argues this hinders cross-examination and requests the preclusion of these purported statements as a remedy.

Court filing (table of contents)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005248.jpg

This document is page 3 of a Government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated October 15, 2021. The Government argues that the defense's proposed deadline of November 15, 2021, for filing Rule 412 motions (regarding the admissibility of victims' sexual behavior) is impractical as it conflicts with jury selection and the Thanksgiving holiday. The Government requests an earlier deadline to allow sufficient time for investigation and *in camera* hearings.

Legal filing / government motion (case 1:20-cr-00330-ajn)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005215.jpg

This legal document, filed on October 13, 2021, argues for the necessity of individual, sequestered voir dire (jury questioning) for a high-publicity case involving a well-known defendant. The filing contends that the sensitive and inflammatory nature of the charges, specifically sexual abuse of minors, makes it unlikely for jurors to be candid in a group setting, thus hindering the ability of both the defense and prosecution to identify biases and ensure a fair trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$40,332,000,000.00
1 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$40,332,000,000.00
1 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
1789-01-01 Received PRC / US Government defense $40,332,000,000.00 Defense Spending ($40,332 MM) View
As Sender
73
As Recipient
33
Total
106

Defense Letter (Def. Ltr.)

From: defense
To: Court

Referenced as 'Def. Ltr. at 7', claiming materials were produced without sealing application.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Redaction issues

From: Government officials
To: defense

Conferred to confirm resolution of pending redaction issues over the weekend.

Meeting/conferral
N/A
Communication Source

Legal compulsion to testify

From: defense
To: Brian

Ms. Menninger confirms 'We have him under subpoena.'

Subpoena
N/A
Communication Source

Topics of cross examination for Kate

From: Government officials
To: defense

Productive conversation regarding upcoming witness cross-examination.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Direct evidence

From: the government
To: defense

Referenced as 'the Letter' containing references to 'direct evidence' of charged crimes.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Request to call attorneys as witnesses

From: defense
To: THE COURT

Request to call Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman to testify during the defense case-in-chief.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Availability of evidence for inspection

From: Government (Ms. Moe)
To: defense

Notification that evidence was available for inspection.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Ex.I

From: defense
To: Court

Referenced as 'Ex.I.' (Exhibit I), likely detailing the asset monitoring proposal.

Legal exhibit
N/A
Communication Source

Def. Mot. 11

From: defense
To: Court

Defense motion arguing that evidence of rape is irrelevant and inflammatory.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Def. Mem. at 35-36

From: defense
To: Court

Argument that Juror 50 repeatedly lied.

Legal memorandum
N/A
Communication Source

Def. Mot. at 11

From: defense
To: Court

Defense motion arguing that the plea agreement should be universally binding.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

3500 material

From: Government officials
To: defense

Reference to disclosure material (Jencks Act material) regarding the witness Matt.

Legal discovery
N/A
Communication Source

3500 Material

From: prosecution
To: defense

Discovery material (Jencks Act material) referenced by Ms. Moe.

Document
N/A
Communication Source

Document Dumps

From: the government
To: defense

Thousands of statements provided in document dumps.

Discovery/document production
N/A
Communication Source

Renewed Bail Motion

From: defense
To: THE COURT

Letters and documentation regarding defendant's ties to the US.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Redaction resolution timeline

From: Government officials
To: defense

Conferred to confirm resolution of pending redaction issues over the weekend.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Mr. Flatley's 3500 information

From: Government officials
To: defense

Defense has received '3500 information' (Jencks Act material) and examples of prior testimony regarding witness Flatley.

Legal disclosure
N/A
Communication Source

Def. Mem. at 44

From: defense
To: Court

Argument regarding probing Juror 50.

Legal memorandum
N/A
Communication Source

Defendant's primary sentencing submission

From: defense
To: THE COURT

Submission reviewed by the court

Submission
N/A
Communication Source

Jane's conversations with her brother

From: Government officials
To: defense

Ms. Menninger states she did not receive the expected disclosure regarding conversations Jane had with her brother.

Disclosure/communication
N/A
Communication Source

Def. Mot. at 13

From: defense
To: Court

Argument that the jury improperly based conviction on New Mexico abuse.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Waiver of extradition rights

From: defense
To: Court

Defense relies on two legal opinions (Def. Ex. U; Def. Ex. V) to claim defendant can irrevocably waive extradition rights.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Response regarding Government Exhibit 52 and co-conspirat...

From: defense
To: Court

Briefing due tonight.

Legal briefing
N/A
Communication Source

Mot., Dkt. No. 390

From: defense
To: Court

Challenge to authenticity of Exhibit 52

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Letter, Dkt. No. 490

From: defense
To: Court

Reference regarding seizure of book

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search