DOJ-OGR-00021110.jpg
698 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
698 KB
Summary
This legal document argues that a District Court's interpretation of statute § 3283 is flawed because it relies on misinterpreted legal precedent. The author contends the court, following a Third Circuit opinion, improperly applied a quote from the *Dodge* case, which concerned a different statute (SORNA), to invent a legislative history for § 3283 that does not exist.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Pham | Party in a legal case |
Mentioned in the case citation U.S. v. Pham.
|
| Nathan, J. | Judge |
Cited as the judge in the U.S. v. Pham case.
|
| Schneider | Party in a legal case |
Mentioned in the case citation U.S. v. Schneider.
|
| Dodge | Party in a legal case |
Mentioned in the case citation United States v. Dodge.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| S.D.N.Y. | government agency |
Referenced in the citation for U.S. v. Pham, indicating the United States District Court for the Southern District of...
|
| District Court | government agency |
Mentioned as the court whose interpretation of § 3283 is being challenged.
|
| Congress | government agency |
Mentioned in the context of extending a statute of limitations and its legislative intent.
|
| Third Circuit | government agency |
Referenced as the source of an opinion (U.S. v. Schneider) that the District Court relied upon.
|
| Eleventh Circuit | government agency |
Referenced as the source of a case (United States v. Dodge) quoted by the Third Circuit.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location of the court in the U.S. v. Pham case, referring to the Southern District of New York.
|
Key Quotes (3)
"§3286(b)’s use of the terms ‘foreseeable’ and ‘commission of such offense’ … dictate a case-specific approach."Source
— Nathan, J.
(Quoted from the U.S. v. Pham case ruling.)
DOJ-OGR-00021110.jpg
Quote #1
"evinced a general intention to cast a wide net to ensnare as many offenses against children as possible."Source
— District Court
(A statement attributed to the District Court's interpretation of Congress's intent when extending the statute of limitations for § 3283.)
DOJ-OGR-00021110.jpg
Quote #2
"Our review of the language of SORNA confirms our conclusion that Congress cast a wide net to ensnare as many offenses against children as possible."Source
— Eleventh Circuit
(Quoted from the United States v. Dodge case, regarding the text of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA).)
DOJ-OGR-00021110.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document