| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
U.S.
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-01 | Court case | U.S. v. Pham, No. 12-cr-423, 2022 WL 993119 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 1, 2022) | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2022-04-01 | Legal ruling | Ruling in the case U.S. v. Pham, No. 12-cr-423, 2022 WL 993119. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
This document is page 11 of a legal filing from Case 22-1426, dated February 28, 2023. It is a table of authorities listing numerous U.S. court cases, dating from 1926 to 2022, which are cited within the main document. Each citation includes the case name, legal reporter information, and the page numbers where the case is referenced.
This legal document argues that a District Court's interpretation of statute § 3283 is flawed because it relies on misinterpreted legal precedent. The author contends the court, following a Third Circuit opinion, improperly applied a quote from the *Dodge* case, which concerned a different statute (SORNA), to invent a legislative history for § 3283 that does not exist.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity