DOJ-OGR-00010558.jpg

787 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 787 KB
Summary

This legal document is a filing by the prosecution arguing against the defendant's motions regarding sentencing. The prosecution asserts that the 2004 Sentencing Manual should apply, citing trial testimony that the conspiracy extended past 2004, and refutes the defendant's claim of having left the conspiracy and her association with Epstein in 2002. The document also notes that the government is prepared to present additional evidence, a message book seized by the Palm Beach Police Department, at the sentencing hearing.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Carolyn Witness
Mentioned for her trial testimony that the offense conduct ran past 2004.
Epstein
Mentioned in the context of the defendant's claim that she broke away from him in 2002.
Martinez Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Martinez, 413 F.3d 239, 242 (2d Cir. 2005)'.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Congress government agency
Mentioned as having increased the applicable penalties for the offenses.
Sentencing Commission government agency
Mentioned as having increased the applicable penalties for the offenses.
Palm Beach Police Department government agency
Mentioned as the agency that seized a message book.
FBI government agency
Mentioned as having investigated and taken custody of a message book.

Timeline (3 events)

2004
The document discusses a conspiracy that the prosecution argues continued past 2004, based on the Indictment and testimony from Carolyn.
defendant Carolyn
A trial where Carolyn testified that the offense conduct ran past 2004.
A message book was seized by the Palm Beach Police Department and transferred to the FBI.
Palm Beach

Locations (1)

Location Context
Inferred from the 'Palm Beach Police Department'.

Relationships (1)

defendant professional Epstein
The document mentions the defendant's claim that she 'broke away from Epstein in 2002', indicating a prior association.

Key Quotes (4)

"goals of sentencing are not served"
Source
— defendant (A claim made by the defendant regarding the application of the 2004 Manual.)
DOJ-OGR-00010558.jpg
Quote #1
"moved on"
Source
— sole defense witness (Testimony from a defense witness stating that the defendant had 'moved on' in 2002.)
DOJ-OGR-00010558.jpg
Quote #2
"once it has been established that there existed a conspiracy of which the defendant was a member, [her] membership is presumed to continue unless and until the defendant proves that the conspiracy was terminated or that [she] took"
Source
— The Court/Legal Precedent (A legal principle cited to argue against the defendant's claim of leaving the conspiracy.)
DOJ-OGR-00010558.jpg
Quote #3
"the right of confrontation does not apply to the sentencing context and does not prohibit the consideration of hearsay testimony in sentencing proceedings."
Source
— United States v. Martinez (A quote from a legal case establishing that hearsay is admissible at sentencing.)
DOJ-OGR-00010558.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document