DOJ-OGR-00010043.jpg
445 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
445 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from March 24, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Brune. She is questioned about whether a legal brief she submitted contained material omissions. Ms. Brune denies any intent to omit material facts, stating they tried to be accurate and were shocked by information received in a subsequent letter.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
Referred to as Ms. Brune, she is the person being questioned (giving testimony) during a direct examination.
|
| MR. SHECHTMAN | Attorney |
Objects to a question, stating it has been "Asked and answered."
|
| MR. DAVIS | Attorney |
Responds to Mr. Shechtman's objection, stating he doesn't believe the witness has answered the question.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Represents the judge presiding over the proceeding, who overrules an objection.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting agency.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-03-24
Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding potential material omissions in a legal brief she submitted.
Courtroom
Relationships (2)
The questioner is conducting a direct examination of the witness, Ms. Brune, in a formal legal setting.
Both are acting as attorneys in the same proceeding, with Mr. Shechtman making an objection and Mr. Davis arguing against it.
Key Quotes (3)
"I do not believe that it was written with the goal of making a material omission."Source
— Brune
(Responding to a question about whether a brief she submitted had material omissions.)
DOJ-OGR-00010043.jpg
Quote #1
"We were shocked when we received the letter."Source
— Brune
(Explaining her state of mind regarding the information in a brief, contrasting it with a letter received later.)
DOJ-OGR-00010043.jpg
Quote #2
"I did not believe that it had material omissions in the sense that anyone writing the brief or in my case signing the brief intended to make material omissions."Source
— Brune
(Clarifying her denial of material omissions by focusing on the lack of intent.)
DOJ-OGR-00010043.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document