MR. DAVIS
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Brune
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Shechtman
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Brune
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Gair
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Brune regarding the decision not to investigate Juror No. 1, Ms. Con... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | Direct examination of witness Brune. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Ms. Brune regarding previous statements and filings. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Redirect examination of Ms. Brune regarding Government Exhibit 28. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | Redirect examination of Ms. Brune by Mr. Davis, during which Government Exhibit 28 (a letter from... | The Court | View |
| 2022-03-24 | Court testimony | Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding potential material omissions in a legal brief she submi... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-02-22 | Court proceeding | Testimony of Ms. Brune during a legal proceeding. | Southern District | View |
DOJ-OGR-00010052.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript detailing the redirect examination of a witness, Ms. Brune, by an attorney, Mr. Davis. During the examination, a document identified as Ms. Brune's "July 21st letter at the Court" is introduced as Government Exhibit 28. After opposing counsel, Mr. Shechtman, states he has no objection, the Court officially receives the exhibit into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00010048.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 22, 2022, detailing the testimony of Ms. Brune. She explains that a legal brief her firm wrote "missed the issue" because they were focused on other aspects of the case and lacked certain information, which she regrets. Ms. Brune also confirms that she believed the jury's verdict to acquit David Parse on four of six charges was fair and impartial.
DOJ-OGR-00010043.jpg
This document is a court transcript from March 24, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Brune. She is questioned about whether a legal brief she submitted contained material omissions. Ms. Brune denies any intent to omit material facts, stating they tried to be accurate and were shocked by information received in a subsequent letter.
DOJ-OGR-00010037.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated March 23, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The questioning centers on a previous statement made by Ms. Trzaskoma to the court, where she offered to submit a letter about newly discovered facts. The questioner probes whether a specific 'Westlaw report' was one of these facts.
DOJ-OGR-00009373.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Page 312, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) documenting the redirect examination of a witness named Ms. Brune by Mr. Davis. The proceedings involve the identification and admission of 'Government Exhibit 28,' which is described as a July 21st letter written by Ms. Brune to the Court. Following the admission of the letter into evidence without objection from Mr. Shechtman, the questioning turns to a Westlaw report attached as an exhibit.
DOJ-OGR-00009372.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding filed on February 24, 2022. It details the cross-examination of a witness named Brune, who is questioned about their firm's decision not to investigate potential juror misconduct by Juror No. 1, Ms. Conrad, following a verdict on May 24th. Brune states that the firm did not believe there was an issue to investigate at the time.
DOJ-OGR-00009369.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (page 308) filed on February 24, 2022. A witness, Ms. Brune, is being questioned by Mr. Davis about a mistake in a legal brief regarding the timing of a Google search relative to receiving a letter. The testimony also confirms that David Parse was convicted of two charges and acquitted of four, and that the witness believed the jury rendered a fair verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00009358.jpg
This document is page 297 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Brune by attorney Mr. Davis. The questioning focuses on a previous statement made by Ms. Trzaskoma regarding a 'suspension opinion' and a 'Westlaw report' that came to light before voir dire. Mr. Davis is pressing the witness to confirm that a Westlaw report was attached to a letter submitted to the court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity