DOJ-OGR-00020851.jpg

623 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 623 KB
Summary

This legal document, dated December 27, 2021, is a filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ms. Maxwell. The author argues that for a conviction on Count Four, the jury must only consider evidence related to the violation of New York Penal Law concerning the transportation of 'Jane' from Florida to New York. The document stresses that any conduct that occurred in New Mexico is irrelevant to this specific charge, citing a statement by the government during the trial to support this point and avoid jury confusion.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan The Honorable
The document is addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan.
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
The subject of the legal argument, alleged to have arranged transportation for 'Jane' in violation of New York Penal ...
Jane Alleged Victim
An individual allegedly transported by Ms. Maxwell from Florida to New York for sex acts with Jeffrey Epstein. Also m...
Jeffrey Epstein
Mentioned as the person with whom 'Jane' was intended to engage in sex acts.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
Court government agency
Referenced throughout the document in the context of the legal proceedings (e.g., 'Court Exhibit #15', 'represented t...

Timeline (3 events)

Alleged travel of 'Jane' to and from New Mexico.
New Mexico
Alleged transportation of 'Jane' from Florida to New York, arranged by Ms. Maxwell.
from Florida to New York
Discussion in court about Court Exhibit #15, where the government clarified the scope of the jury charge.
Court
government

Locations (3)

Location Context
Mentioned as a location of 'Jane's' alleged travel and sexual activity, which the document argues should be excluded ...
Mentioned as the origin of 'Jane's' alleged transportation by Ms. Maxwell.
Mentioned as the destination of 'Jane's' alleged transportation and the jurisdiction whose laws (New York Penal Law) ...

Relationships (2)

Ms. Maxwell co-conspirator Jeffrey Epstein
The document alleges Ms. Maxwell arranged for Jane to be transported to engage in sex acts with Jeffrey Epstein.
Ms. Maxwell alleged perpetrator-victim Jane
The indictment alleges that Ms. Maxwell arranged for Jane to be transported for the purpose of engaging in sex acts.

Key Quotes (1)

"The only illegal sexual activity identified in the entirety of the jury charge is a statute in New York. There cannot be any risk of confusion on that score. This particular charge reminds the jury of that and includes that language as well. The jury has not been charged about any laws in New Mexico; so there can’t be any risk of confusion for exactly that reason."
Source
— government (Quoted from a court transcript (Tr. 3140:10-16) during a discussion about Court Exhibit #15, where the government stressed that the charges are based on New York law, not New Mexico law.)
DOJ-OGR-00020851.jpg
Quote #1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document