DOJ-OGR-00004883.jpg

740 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing / judicial opinion (exhibit)
File Size: 740 KB
Summary

This document is Page 71 of 80 from a filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 2, 2021. The content is an excerpt from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion overturning Bill Cosby's conviction ([J-100-2020]), discussing the legal principle of 'reasonable reliance' on a prosecutor's public promise not to prosecute. This precedent was likely submitted by Maxwell's defense to argue for the validity of the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).

People (3)

Name Role Context
Cosby Defendant (in cited case)
Subject of the legal opinion regarding reliance on a prosecutor's promise not to prosecute.
D.A. Castor District Attorney
Made a public announcement regarding a charging decision that Cosby relied upon.
Justice Black Supreme Court Justice (Historical)
Cited for an explanation regarding the necessity of counsel and knowledge in the criminal justice process.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Commonwealth
Prosecuting authority (Pennsylvania) in the Cosby case.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Indicated by the Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR).
United States District Court
Implied by case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (SDNY).

Timeline (1 events)

2021-07-02
Document filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Court

Relationships (1)

Cosby Legal/Adversarial D.A. Castor
Cosby relied on Castor's public announcement regarding charging decisions.

Key Quotes (3)

"If Cosby’s reliance was unreasonable... then reasonableness would require a defendant in a similar position to disbelieve an elected district attorney’s public statement and to discount the experience and wisdom of his own counsel."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00004883.jpg
Quote #1
"We find nothing unreasonable about Cosby’s reliance upon his attorneys and upon D.A. Castor’s public announcement of the Commonwealth’s charging decision."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00004883.jpg
Quote #2
"We decline to construe as unreasonable the failure to do that which the law does not require."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00004883.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document