bar of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Organization
Mentions
18
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
9
Also known as:
The Commonwealth

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

012-02.pdf

This document is a court order filed on July 15, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, granting attorney Martin G. Weinberg's motion to be admitted Pro Hac Vice. This admission allows Weinberg, a Massachusetts-based attorney, to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in criminal case No. 19 Cr 490 under Judge Richard M. Berman.

Court order (order for admission pro hac vice)
2025-12-26

DOJ-OGR-00000386.jpg

This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 16, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg of Boston, MA, to be admitted Pro Hac Vice, allowing him to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000364.jpg

This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 15, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg to be admitted "Pro Hac Vice," allowing him to practice in this specific case as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000361.jpg

This document is a legal motion filed on July 15, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Attorney Martin G. Weinberg requests admission Pro Hac Vice (permission to practice in this specific jurisdiction for this case) to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. Weinberg confirms his good standing with the Massachusetts Bar and provides his contact information in Boston.

Legal motion (court filing)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000360.jpg

This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 15, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order, issued by Judge Richard M. Berman, grants attorney Martin G. Weinberg's motion for admission *pro hac vice*. This allows Weinberg, a member of the Massachusetts bar, to officially act as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in this specific criminal case.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004883.jpg

This document is Page 71 of 80 from a filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 2, 2021. The content is an excerpt from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion overturning Bill Cosby's conviction ([J-100-2020]), discussing the legal principle of 'reasonable reliance' on a prosecutor's public promise not to prosecute. This precedent was likely submitted by Maxwell's defense to argue for the validity of the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).

Court filing / judicial opinion (exhibit)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004863.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 2, 2021. It contains an excerpt from a judicial opinion regarding *Commonwealth v. Cosby*, specifically discussing former D.A. Bruce Castor's testimony and emails asserting his intent to permanently bind the Commonwealth from prosecuting Bill Cosby for a 2004 incident to remove his Fifth Amendment protections in civil court. This case law was likely cited in the Maxwell trial regarding the validity of non-prosecution agreements.

Court filing / legal opinion exhibit
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004836.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), though the text itself details the legal history of the Bill Cosby non-prosecution agreement (Commonwealth v. Cosby). It describes communications between former DA Bruce Castor and DA Risa Ferman regarding a 2005 agreement where the Commonwealth promised not to prosecute Cosby so that he could not invoke the Fifth Amendment in a civil deposition. This document was likely submitted by Maxwell's defense to argue legal precedent regarding the enforceability of non-prosecution agreements.

Legal filing / court opinion exhibit
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004834.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), likely submitted by the defense. It contains an excerpt from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion regarding Bill Cosby, detailing former DA Bruce Castor's testimony that he intentionally issued a press release in 2005 declining to prosecute Cosby to prevent him from invoking the Fifth Amendment in a civil lawsuit filed by Andrea Constand. The document highlights Castor's strategy to 'set up the dominoes' to force Cosby to testify civilly by removing the threat of criminal prosecution.

Court filing / legal exhibit (excerpt from commonwealth v. cosby opinion filed in us v. maxwell)
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity