DOJ-OGR-00000119.tif
40.7 KB
Extraction Summary
0
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document/court ruling excerpt
File Size:
40.7 KB
Summary
This document is an excerpt from a legal analysis concerning the binding nature of non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) on different U.S. Attorney's offices. It discusses whether an NPA entered into by the Southern District of Florida could bind the Southern District of New York, concluding it did not based on Second Circuit precedent. The text cites several court cases, including Santobello v. New York, United States v. Ready, United States v. Annabi, United States v. Salameh, and United States v. Gonzalez, to support its legal arguments regarding contract principles and the interpretation of plea agreements.
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York |
Subject of whether a non-prosecution agreement binds them
|
|
| U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida |
Question of their power to bind the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York
|
|
| Second Circuit |
Court whose precedent is applied
|
Key Quotes (1)
""A plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement contemplates a broader restriction.""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000119.tif
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document