HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017704.jpg

1.75 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal exhibit / law review excerpt
File Size: 1.75 MB
Summary

This document is page 69 of 78 from a House Oversight Committee file (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017704) associated with attorney David Schoen. It contains an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing 'Rule 60. Victim's Rights,' specifically regarding enforcement, limitations on relief, and the inability to request a new trial based on rights violations. The text includes a discussion section criticizing the Advisory Committee for deviating from the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in ways that reduce victims' rights.

People (2)

Name Role Context
David Schoen Attorney/Submitter
Name appears at the bottom of the document, indicating he likely submitted this exhibit to the House Oversight Commit...
Cassell Author/Source
Referenced in footnotes 540 and 541 as the author of 'Proposed Amendments'. Likely Paul Cassell.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
Utah Law Review
Source of the text (2007 Utah L. Rev. 861).
Advisory Committee
The body responsible for proposing the Rules of Criminal Procedure discussed in the text.
Congress
Mentioned as the body that commanded the rights in the CVRA.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Referenced in the law review citation.

Relationships (2)

Schoen's name appears on a document stamped with House Oversight Bates numbering.
Cassell Critic Advisory Committee
The text (likely authored by Cassell per footnotes) criticizes the Advisory Committee's deviations from the CVRA.

Key Quotes (3)

"But the Advisory Committee deviates from the CVRA's language in five places for reasons that are unexplained - and unexplainable."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017704.jpg
Quote #1
"The patient reader of this Article may not be surprised that all five of these deviations operate in the same direction - to reduce a crime victim's rights from what Congress has commanded."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017704.jpg
Quote #2
"In no case is a failure to afford a victim any right under these rules grounds for a new trial."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017704.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document