EFTA00015825.pdf
132 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain / legal correspondence
File Size:
132 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain between David Oscar Markus, representing Ghislaine Maxwell, and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding her appeal of a bail denial. The correspondence, dating from March 25 to April 10, 2021, covers Markus's request for unredacted docket entries, discussions on expediting the appeal process, and the filing of an unredacted Exhibit F under seal. The US Attorney confirms the existence of a protective order and agrees not to oppose expediting consideration of the appeal, provided the 10-day response window remains intact.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Oscar Markus | Defense Attorney |
Counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, Markus/Moss law firm
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Subject of the legal case and appeal regarding bail denial
|
| [REDACTED] | Assistant United States Attorney |
Prosecutor, SDNY (USANYS)
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Markus/Moss |
Law firm representing Ghislaine Maxwell
|
|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York
|
|
| Southern District of New York |
Court jurisdiction
|
Timeline (2 events)
2021-03-25
David Oscar Markus engages as counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell for her appeal regarding bail denial.
New York
2021-04-09
Government indicates intent to file unredacted copy of Exhibit F under seal.
SDNY
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of the Assistant United States Attorney
|
|
|
Website of the defense counsel
|
Relationships (2)
Markus states: 'I have been engaged to represent Ghislaine Maxwell in her appeal'
Correspondence regarding legal motions and protective orders in U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Key Quotes (4)
"I have been engaged to represent Ghislaine Maxwell in her appeal from the denial of her third application for bail."Source
EFTA00015825.pdf
Quote #1
"I will need access to certain unredacted documents, including docket entries 4, 18, 22, 97, 100, 103, 106, 159, 160, 165, 171, 169."Source
EFTA00015825.pdf
Quote #2
"We do not oppose the Court expediting consideration but do oppose any request to shorten the ten days by which we have to respond."Source
EFTA00015825.pdf
Quote #3
"If you are filing that one unredacted pleading, would you be willing to file the others as well? I think the court should have them all."Source
EFTA00015825.pdf
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document