DOJ-OGR-00020971.jpg
685 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
685 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on April 1, 2022, discusses the jury selection process in a criminal case. It details how the Defendant chose not to challenge for cause two prospective jurors, Juror A and Juror B, despite their disclosures of personal experiences related to sexual abuse. The document contrasts their situations with that of another juror, Juror 50, and notes that all affirmed their ability to remain fair and impartial.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Defendant | Defendant in a legal case |
Mentioned throughout as the party who did not challenge certain prospective jurors for cause.
|
| Juror 50 | Prospective Juror |
A juror whose disclosed experiences are used as a point of comparison for other jurors. Affirmed his ability to be im...
|
| Juror A | Prospective Juror |
A juror who reported being sexually molested by an uncle at age 12 or 13. She was not challenged for cause by the Def...
|
| Juror B | Prospective Juror |
A juror who reported that a friend was coerced and sexually abused by a professor. She was not challenged for cause b...
|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Referenced in a citation to "Maxwell Post-Hearing Br. at 4," indicating this is likely the Defendant's name.
|
| Juror C | Prospective Juror |
Mentioned in a footnote as a juror whose number has been redacted for privacy.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | government agency |
Mentioned as the body that asked questions of jurors and redacted juror numbers for privacy.
|
| Pyramid Co. of Onondaga | company |
Mentioned in the case citation 'Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga' in a footnote.
|
| Press-Enter. Co. | company |
Mentioned in the case citation 'Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Ct. of Cal., Riverside Cnty.' in a footnote.
|
| Superior Ct. of Cal., Riverside Cnty. | government agency |
Mentioned in the case citation 'Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Ct. of Cal., Riverside Cnty.' in a footnote.
|
Timeline (4 events)
A friend of Juror B was coerced and sexually abused by a professor. This was reported by Juror B two years before jury selection.
Juror B's friend
a professor
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the case citation 'Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga'.
|
|
|
Mentioned in the case citation 'Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Ct. of Cal., Riverside Cnty.'.
|
Relationships (3)
The document states Juror A reported she was 'sexually molested by an uncle'.
The Defendant did not challenge Juror A for cause during jury selection.
Key Quotes (4)
"sexually molested by an uncle when [she] was 12, 13."Source
— Juror A
(Describing her personal experience with sexual abuse during jury selection.)
DOJ-OGR-00020971.jpg
Quote #1
"someone familiar to [her] . . . who was part of [her] life,"Source
— Maxwell Post-Hearing Br.
(A quote from a legal brief, presumably describing the perpetrator of Juror A's abuse.)
DOJ-OGR-00020971.jpg
Quote #2
"upset [him] in such a way that would distract [him] from [his] duty as a juror."Source
— Juror 50
(Quoted from a hearing transcript, where Juror 50 affirmed that the subject matter would not improperly affect him.)
DOJ-OGR-00020971.jpg
Quote #3
"issues of reporting or not reporting sexual abuse that might"Source
— Juror 50
(Part of a statement made by Juror 50 at a March 8 hearing, affirming his impartiality.)
DOJ-OGR-00020971.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document