DOJ-OGR-00002776.jpg
707 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
707 KB
Summary
This legal document is a court opinion or order analyzing a defendant's flight risk. The Court is not persuaded by the Defendant's proposals to renounce her UK citizenship or to have a retired federal judge oversee her finances, concluding that she would still be able to delay or resist extradition. The Court maintains that the Defendant remains a flight risk due to her substantial international ties and the incentive to flee.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Defendant | Defendant |
The subject of the court's analysis regarding flight risk, extradition, and proposed conditions for release.
|
| Cohen | Party in a cited case |
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Cohen, No. C 10-00547 (SI), 2010 WL 5387757'.
|
| retired federal judge | Proposed overseer |
The Defendant proposed to have a retired federal judge provide oversight over her financial affairs.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | Government agency |
The judicial body making determinations about the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions.
|
| Government | Government agency |
The party arguing against the Defendant's proposals, whose arguments persuaded the Court.
|
Timeline (3 events)
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The country of the Defendant's citizenship, which she offered to renounce, and from which extradition is discussed.
|
|
|
Northern District of California, mentioned in a case citation.
|
|
|
Mentioned in the context of the Defendant's willingness to renounce her French and UK citizenship.
|
Relationships (2)
The Court is making a determination about the Defendant's legal status and conditions for appearance.
The Government is arguing against the Defendant's proposals in a legal proceeding.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document