EFTA00021532.pdf

105 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email thread (legal correspondence)
File Size: 105 KB
Summary

This document is an email chain from August 2, 2019, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Defense Counsel regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. The correspondence details a dispute over whether specific discovery materials, including statements to law enforcement and cell site data, should be filed under seal or publicly with redactions. The prosecution accuses the defense of violating a protective order by publicly filing sensitive exhibits, while the defense discusses logistical issues regarding getting the defendant's affidavit signed at the MCC without the legal team acting as witnesses.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Michael Bachrach Defense Attorney
CC'd on the email chain: michael@mbachlaw.com
bkoffsky Defense Attorney
CC'd on the email chain: bkoffsky@snet.net
Assistant United States Attorney (Redacted) Prosecutor
Sender of emails from USANYS, discussing protective order violations
Defense Counsel (Redacted) Defense Attorney
Sender of emails from Garden City, NY firm; discussing motions and notary issues
Jeffrey Epstein (Implied/Redacted) Defendant
Referred to as the person needing to sign an affidavit at MCC (Metropolitan Correctional Center). Context matches the...

Timeline (2 events)

2019-08-02
Legal dispute over filing motions under seal vs public filing with redactions.
Email Correspondence
Defense Team US Attorney's Office
Future date (relative to 2019-08-02)
Planned signature of affidavit at MCC or Open Court.
MCC or Court
Defendant (Epstein) Legal Team

Locations (3)

Relationships (2)

Michael Bachrach Co-Counsel/Legal Team Defense Counsel (Garden City)
CC'd on privileged attorney communications.
Defendant (Epstein) Incarceration MCC
Reference to signing affidavit at MCC.

Key Quotes (3)

"We noticed that you publicly filed four documents that were marked sensitive (Exhibits A through D to your cell site motion) in violation of the protective order."
Source
EFTA00021532.pdf
Quote #1
"affidavit hasn't been signed because the only regular access to a notary are members of his legal team and we don't want to witness his signature."
Source
EFTA00021532.pdf
Quote #2
"We will have him sign it through whatever the process is at MCC or in open court at our next appearance."
Source
EFTA00021532.pdf
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document