DOJ-OGR-00010304.jpg
749 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
0
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
749 KB
Summary
This legal document is page 14 of a court filing, arguing against a defendant's motion claiming juror bias. The author contends that there is no evidence of actual bias from Juror 50, citing the juror's statements, the jury's diligent five-day deliberation, and the resulting split verdict. The document also dismisses the claim of implied bias, stating that the circumstances do not meet the narrow criteria established by the Second Circuit.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
The subject of a defendant's motion regarding alleged juror bias. The document discusses his testimony during voir di...
|
| Smith |
Party in the legal case Smith v. Phillips, cited as precedent.
|
|
| Phillips |
Party in the legal case Smith v. Phillips, cited as precedent.
|
|
| Greer |
Party in a legal case cited as precedent (See Greer, 285 F.3d at 171).
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | government agency |
Referred to as the judicial body handling the case, including voir dire and receiving questions from the jury.
|
| Second Circuit | government agency |
A U.S. Court of Appeals whose legal precedents on implied bias are cited.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Jury deliberations that lasted for five days, during which the jury asked questions and sought transcripts before rendering a split verdict.
jury
Key Quotes (1)
"The court . . . noted that the outcome of the trial demonstrated that all the jurors . . . fairly considered the evidence."Source
— Greer, 285 F.3d at 171
(Cited as legal precedent to support the argument that the jury remained impartial.)
DOJ-OGR-00010304.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document