DOJ-OGR-00017846.jpg

524 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

8
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 524 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from a sidebar on August 10, 2022. Attorneys Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim debate with the judge about the admissibility of a witness's testimony regarding a confrontation between 'Jane' and her mother, where Jane allegedly questioned her mother about money and implicitly acknowledged being abused. The discussion focuses on whether this testimony constitutes a prior consistent statement and its presence in the '3500 material'.

People (8)

Name Role Context
THE COURT Judge
Presiding over the legal proceeding and questioning the attorneys during a sidebar.
Ms. Moe Attorney/Counsel
An attorney arguing for the inclusion of a witness's testimony regarding a statement made by Jane.
Jane Witness/Victim
A person whose alleged statement to her mother is the subject of the legal discussion. She is described as having bee...
Jane's mother
The recipient of a statement from Jane, and was allegedly present during a confrontation.
Ms. Sternheim Attorney/Counsel
An attorney arguing against the admissibility of the testimony, questioning its basis as a prior consistent statement.
Jeffrey Epstein
Mentioned in the context of Jane's mother being irate, but not the subject of a direct confrontation between Jane and...
Jane's brother
Mentioned by Ms. Sternheim as a possible alternative source of the information in question.
Matt Witness
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a direct examination ("Matt - direct").

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
A sidebar conversation during a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) to discuss the admissibility of testimony.
Courtroom
THE COURT MS. MOE MS. STERNHEIM
A witness recalls being present when Jane confronted her mother, saying "How could you not know the money wasn't for free? How could you not know?"
a room
Jane Jane's mother witness (presumably Matt)

Relationships (3)

Jane personal Jane's mother
The document describes a confrontation between Jane and her mother, indicating a familial relationship (daughter-mother).
Jane personal Jane's brother
Ms. Sternheim mentions 'her brother', indicating a sibling relationship.
MS. MOE professional MS. STERNHEIM
Both are participating as opposing counsel in a legal proceeding, arguing before the court.

Key Quotes (3)

"How could you not know the money wasn't for free? How could you not know?"
Source
— Jane (A statement Jane allegedly made to her mother, which a witness recalls hearing.)
DOJ-OGR-00017846.jpg
Quote #1
"There's been no testimony by Jane about confrontation with her mother at this time."
Source
— MS. STERNHEIM (Arguing against the introduction of the witness's testimony by pointing out Jane herself has not testified about this specific event.)
DOJ-OGR-00017846.jpg
Quote #2
"This is a statement from Jane to her mother essentially acknowledging she was abused, expressing"
Source
— MS. MOE (Explaining the significance of Jane's alleged statement as an acknowledgement of abuse.)
DOJ-OGR-00017846.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document