| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
JANE
|
Family |
15
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Friend |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Familial |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Espinosa
|
Communication |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Pursuit of contact |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein/Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Admiration |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Familial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Daughter mother |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Contact nature unspecified |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | First sighting of 'Jane' in the office. | The Office | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jane visiting the office with her mother. | The office | View |
| N/A | Personal hardship | Jane's father died and her family lost their home. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Death of a family member | Jane's father passed away suddenly. | Florida | View |
| N/A | Trip | Jane visiting Epstein's house. The speaker claims she was accompanied by her mother or mother and... | Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | Confrontation | A witness recalls being present when Jane confronted her mother, saying "How could you not know t... | a room | View |
| N/A | Accommodation booking | Cim Espinosa specifically booked Jane and her mother into one of Epstein's apartments. | Epstein's apartments | View |
| N/A | Lawsuit | A lawsuit was allegedly filed by Jane and her mother against Jane's teacher for pulling her hair. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | The witness and her mother went to Epstein's house for tea and sat by the pool. | Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | Confrontation | Jane confronted her mother about money not being free, implying the mother knew about the abuse. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Confrontation | Jane confronted her mother about Jeffrey Epstein. | a house | View |
| N/A | Confrontation | Jane's mother found out Jane had spoken with a guidance counselor, had a strong negative reaction... | Their household | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visits to Epstein's home | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Initial meeting/tea between Jane, her mother, and Jeffrey Epstein. | Epstein's House | View |
| N/A | Visit | Witness was allegedly at Epstein's house with her mother and brothers. | Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | Living arrangement | The witness's mother and other family members lived in her house due to financial difficulties. | Jane's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visits to Epstein's home in Palm Beach. | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jane, her mother, and her brothers using apartments in New York. | New York | View |
| 2025-01-01 | N/A | Jane sent a signed headshot to Jeffrey Epstein at her mother's direction | Unknown | View |
| 2025-01-01 | N/A | Jane's father gets sick and passes away, leaving the family broke. | Jane's home | View |
| 2011-01-01 | Confrontation | Jane confronted her mother about money related to Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 1997-03-01 | N/A | Jane and her mother filed a lawsuit against school staff | Unknown court jurisdiction | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Application | Jane and her mother signed an application for a summer program at Interlochen. | Interlochen | View |
| 1994-01-01 | Trip | Jane and her mother went to Epstein's house in Palm Beach for tea after being invited. | Epstein's house in Palm Beach | View |
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed Aug 10, 2022) detailing a sidebar conversation between the Judge and defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca during the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. The discussion focuses on a semantic argument regarding whether the witness's prior testimony of 'multiple occasions' is inconsistent with a specific statement of observing a person named 'Jane' exactly 'three' times at Epstein's Palm Beach home. The defense argues that 'three' contradicts 'multiple,' while the Court questions this logic.
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a legal argument regarding the admissibility of a document. An attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, argues against an objection from defense counsel, stating that the document qualifies as an 'adoptive business record' of a school because it was integrated into their files and relied upon, despite a witness's testimony questioning its reliability. The judge ultimately overrules the objection, allowing the document into evidence.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Ghislaine Maxwell trial) documenting a sidebar objection by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. She argues against the admissibility of a school record, comparing it to a police report with third-party hearsay, specifically regarding a form that lists Jeffrey Epstein as 'financially responsible' for a student referred to as 'Jane'. The defense argues it is unclear who wrote Epstein's name on the form (Jane or her mother) and challenges the reliability of that specific information.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Matt regarding his past relationship with a victim referred to as 'Jane.' The testimony covers Jane's reaction to Ghislaine Maxwell's 2020 arrest, where Jane confirmed to Matt that Maxwell was the woman at Jeffrey Epstein's house who had made her feel comfortable. The witness also relays a conversation where Jane told her mother that money she received 'was not free.'
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Matt. Matt recounts a conversation from 2011 where he witnessed a person named Jane confront her mother about money connected to Jeffrey Epstein. Jane accused her mother of knowing the money was not 'free' and questioned how her mother thought she had received it.
This document is a court transcript from a sidebar on August 10, 2022. Attorneys Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim debate with the judge about the admissibility of a witness's testimony regarding a confrontation between 'Jane' and her mother, where Jane allegedly questioned her mother about money and implicitly acknowledged being abused. The discussion focuses on whether this testimony constitutes a prior consistent statement and its presence in the '3500 material'.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Matt. Matt describes his former girlfriend, Jane, and her 'brutal' relationship with her mother. He recounts witnessing an event around 2011 where Jane confronted her mother about Jeffrey Epstein, which prompts an objection from an attorney, Ms. Sternheim.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Matt by prosecutor Ms. Moe. Matt testifies about conversations he had with 'Jane' regarding her childhood financial hardship, specifically detailing how her family went broke paying for her father's medical treatments before he died. The testimony highlights extreme poverty, noting that Jane, her mother, and two brothers lived in a small place where the three children shared a single bed.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Redirect of witness 'Jane') filed on August 10, 2022. The witness testifies about her family's financial struggles and how Jeffrey Epstein provided financial assistance after she met him and Ghislaine Maxwell. Specific assistance included cash, a computer, tuition for Interlochen Arts Camp, and boarding school tuition at Interlochen Arts Academy for her younger brother.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. An attorney questions Jane about a past lawsuit allegedly filed by her and her mother against her teacher for pulling her hair, which Jane denies knowing about. Another attorney, Ms. Menninger, discusses the presentation of certified court exhibits (J-7, J-8, J-9) with the judge to clarify the record.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on the financial support she provided to her mother, who lived with her, and a conversation she had with her attorney, Mr. Glassman, about cooperating in a criminal case after hiring him in September 2019. An objection by Ms. Moe to a question about this conversation was sustained by the court.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning attorney, Ms. Menninger, confronts Jane with her alleged prior statements about being at Epstein's house with her mother and brothers, and being driven there by a chauffeur. Jane repeatedly responds that she does not recall making the statements about her family but confirms discussing the chauffeur.
This document is page 44 (internal pagination 450) of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell). A witness identified as 'Jane' is under cross-examination regarding an initial meeting ('tea') with Jeffrey Epstein attended by Jane and her mother. The questioning highlights that Jane previously told the government (in Oct 2021) that Maxwell was not present at this specific meeting, and that Epstein referred to his philanthropic activities (scholarships/mentoring) using singular pronouns ('he') rather than plural.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named 'Jane'. The questioning focuses on a visit Jane and her mother made to Epstein's house in Palm Beach, confirming they were the only people there for tea by the pool. The witness states she does not recall if Ghislaine Maxwell was present and is also questioned about a conversation she had with the government in October 2021.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on her activities in 1996, including performances and applications to programs like a School of the Arts and Interlochen. The central point of this excerpt is to establish that on three of her applications from that time, there was no mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Opening Statement by Ms. Sternheim) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the background of a witness named 'Jane,' describing her artistic upbringing, attendance at the Epstein-sponsored Interlochen program, and visits to Epstein's Palm Beach home with her mother and brothers. The defense argues that while Jane accepted flights from Epstein, nothing inappropriate occurred during their interactions, and notes she only decided to involve herself in the case after Epstein's death.
This page is a transcript of a defense summation (Ms. Menninger) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The attorney attempts to impeach a witness ('Jane') by highlighting discrepancies in her memory regarding the New York house, specifically her failure to recall a major 1994 reconstruction described by witnesses Juan Alessi and Larry Visoski. The text also mentions specific decor described by the accuser ('paintings of orgies') and notes that Cim Espinosa, an employee, specifically booked apartments for Jane and her mother.
This document is a partial transcript from a legal proceeding, likely a summation, dated August 10, 2022. The speaker, 'I', questions the credibility of 'Jane' regarding alleged sexual abuse, lawsuits, and travel dates, noting inconsistencies in her accounts and her mother's absence from testifying. The document also mentions Jane receiving 'wads of cash' from Jeffrey Epstein and details several of Jane's trips, including one from New Jersey to New Mexico in May '97 and to Europe in January '98.
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The defense argues that the accuser 'Jane's' memories have been manipulated by 'post-event suggestion' and financial motives, citing inconsistencies between her current testimony and a 2015 story she told the press. The attorney highlights testimony from witnesses Juan Alessi and Larry Visoski to contend that Jane was older than 14 when she met Epstein and that she initially visited Epstein's house with her mother and brothers, not alone.
This document is a page from the government's summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Prosecutor Ms. Moe describes how Maxwell and Epstein groomed a victim identified as 'Jane' beginning at a summer camp in 1994 when she was in middle school. The text details the 'older sister' dynamic Maxwell employed, the use of shopping and money, and a specific instance of sexual abuse by Epstein in a pool house.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa by attorney Mr. Everdell. The testimony confirms that an individual referred to as 'Jane,' along with her mother and brothers, regularly used apartments in New York during the late 1990s and early 2000s. The questioning then shifts to the witness's observations of the relationship and interactions between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell while working in their office.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) recording the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The testimony focuses on identifying individuals who held regular apartments in a specific building associated with Jeffrey Epstein. The witness identifies Epstein's pilots, a woman named Jane and her family, Shelly Lewis (described as a friend of Epstein), and Emmy Taylor as individuals who had apartments there.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness is questioned about their observations of the relationship between individuals named Jane and Mr. Epstein. Espinosa testifies to seeing them interact in an office three or four times and describes their impression of the relationship as "loving."
This document is a partial court transcript from the direct examination of Ms. Espinosa on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on an individual named Jane, her relationship as Jeffrey's goddaughter, and how this status influenced her treatment in 'the office' where her mother also worked. The examination also inquires about Jane's siblings and the extent of contact between Jane's mother and Epstein.
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. The witness identifies a person (referred to by the pseudonym 'Jane') from a document and testifies that Jane visited the office approximately five times, appearing to be around 18 years old, and was accompanied by her mother. Attorney Mr. Everdell is also present.
Frequent calls over a couple of months asking for Epstein.
Jane stated the money was not free.
Epstein told Jane's mother he would help Jane and that he gave scholarships (described as 'the cover').
The witness is asked to confirm they received calls from Jane's mother.
Epstein told Jane's mother that he would help Jane; that he gave scholarships.
Mother told Jane she should never talk about what goes on in their house.
Mother expressed that she was impressed by their wealth/affluence and that Jane should be grateful for their attention.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity