DOJ-OGR-00019443.jpg

655 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
5
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 655 KB
Summary

This legal document, part of a court filing from March 2, 2020, outlines a procedural history involving civil protective orders in a criminal case. In 2019, the Government successfully modified a protective order in one court (Court-1) to obtain materials from a 'Recipient' for a grand jury, while another court (Court-2) denied a similar request. The current court is now permitting the Defendant, who learned of this through discovery, to provide this sealed information to Court-1 and Court-2 so those courts can determine whether to unseal related materials.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Recipient Recipient
Mentioned as the party who turned over materials to the Government after a civil protective order was modified.
Defendant Defendant
A party in the criminal matter who learned of sealed information through discovery and is now permitted by the Court ...
counsel counsel
Mentioned in a quote from the Government regarding making sealed applications to other courts.
judicial decision makers Judicial decision maker
Mentioned as individuals whose identities are part of the sealed information the Defendant is now permitted to share ...

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
Government government agency
Sought modification of civil protective orders, received materials from the Recipient, and is a party in the current ...
criminal grand jury legal body
The body for which compliance with subpoenas was sought by modifying civil protective orders.
Court-1 court
A court that permitted the modification of a civil protective order in April 2019.
Court-2 court
A court that did not permit the modification of a civil protective order.
Court court
The court presiding over the current criminal matter, which is issuing the order described in the document.

Timeline (5 events)

2019-02
The Government, ex parte and under seal, sought modification of civil protective orders to permit compliance with criminal grand jury subpoenas.
2019-04
Court-1 permitted the modification of the civil protective orders.
Court-1
2019-04
Subsequent to Court-1's ruling, another court, Court-2, did not permit the modification.
Court-2
The Defendant learned of sealed information as a result of Rule 16 discovery in the criminal matter.
As a result of the modification by Court-1, the Recipient turned over certain materials covered by the protective order to the Government.

Relationships (2)

Government adversarial (legal) Defendant
The document describes a "criminal matter" where the Defendant learned information through "Rule 16 discovery," indicating a prosecutor-defendant relationship.
Government legal/investigative Recipient
The Recipient turned over materials to the Government as a result of a court-ordered modification of a protective order, suggesting the Recipient was compelled to provide information for an investigation.

Key Quotes (1)

"there is no impediment to counsel making sealed applications to Court-1 and Court-2, respectively, to unseal the relevant materials."
Source
— Government (Quoted from Dkt. No. 46 at 3 n.5, indicating the Government's position on how to proceed with unsealing materials.)
DOJ-OGR-00019443.jpg
Quote #1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document