DOJ-OGR-00001668.jpg
1.09 MB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (government letter/brief to court)
File Size:
1.09 MB
Summary
This document is page 5 of a Government filing from July 28, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues against a defense proposal that would allow them to publicly name victims and witnesses, stating that such a request is broad, unjustified, and contrary to the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The text highlights the distinction between the previous Epstein protective order and the current case, emphasizing that victims should not fear reprisal or shaming by having their identities broadcast by the defense.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Recipient of the letter/filing (The Honorable).
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Deceased Sex Offender |
Mentioned regarding previous litigation, his suicide, and victims shared with the defendant.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Referenced explicitly as 'Ghislaine Maxwell' and repeatedly as 'the defendant'. The document discusses her counsel's ...
|
| Defense Counsel | Lawyers for Ghislaine Maxwell |
Seeking permission to publicly identify victims; criticized by the Government for lacking legal basis.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied author (Government) and footer 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
|
| Federal Court (SDNY) |
Implied by the case caption and address to Judge Nathan.
|
Timeline (2 events)
July 28, 2020
Prior to July 2020
Dismissal of indictment against Jeffrey Epstein following his suicide
Legal proceedings
Relationships (2)
Document refers to 'victims of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein' jointly.
Refers to 'The defendant and her counsel'.
Key Quotes (4)
"The victims of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein have suffered enough, and the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, applicable law, and common decency compel far more protection of their privacy interests here than the defense proposal would afford."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001668.jpg
Quote #1
"Those victims could not possibly have predicted, much less chosen, that their names would be publicly broadcast by defense counsel in connection with a subsequent criminal case."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001668.jpg
Quote #2
"At bottom, the defendant and her counsel seek an unlimited ability to name victims and witnesses publicly, for no discernible reason, and without justification or legal basis."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001668.jpg
Quote #3
"Victims should be able to continue to come forward, in the ways and in the venues they themselves choose, without fear of reprisal, shaming, or other consequence arising from having their identities broadcast by defense counsel in this case."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001668.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document