federal court
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-03 | N/A | Maxwell's attorney wrote a letter to the court regarding prison conditions (referred to as 'Wedne... | New York | View |
EFTA00032928.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 27-28, 2019, regarding a transcript request for Case No. 19-CR-490 (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein). The most recent email highlights a specific portion of the transcript, noting that 'relevant discussion starts when Reid stands up,' likely referring to defense attorney Reid Weingarten's statements during the hearing to dismiss the indictment following Epstein's death. The sender and recipient identities are redacted.
EFTA00029807.pdf
This document is a draft speech or press statement by U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman announcing the indictment of Ghislaine Maxwell. The speech references the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein one year prior, his subsequent suicide, and the commitment of the office to pursue those who enabled him. It emphasizes the courage of the victims and asserts that justice applies regardless of wealth or status.
EFTA00027459.pdf
This document is a chain of three emails forwarded between June 28 and June 30, 2021. The subject concerns a 'Maxwell Suppression Opinion,' referencing the legal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20cr330). The final email includes attachments of a sealed opinion and order dated June 25, 2021. All participants in the email chain are redacted.
EFTA00021370.pdf
An email dated July 23, 2019, discussing a response to a bail appeal. The email embeds a news file regarding a federal judge denying Jeffrey Epstein bail and rejecting his request for house arrest. The sender suggests that 'Boustani papers' (likely referring to the Jean Boustani legal case) would be helpful for the current legal strategy.
EFTA00018886.pdf
An internal email chain within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated November 4, 2021. An employee forwards a Law360 news alert to a colleague with the comment 'Seriously?'. The news alert details a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney comparing her prison conditions to those of the fictional character Hannibal Lecter in 'Silence of the Lambs'.
EFTA00018236.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 5, 2021. The Government objects to the defense's use of Rule 17(c) subpoenas, specifically one directed at law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (BSF) seeking a victim's original diary, characterizing it as an improper 'fishing expedition' for discovery. The Government requests that the Court require the defense to provide notice of all future subpoenas and to share any materials obtained with the prosecution.
EFTA00015023.pdf
This document is an internal email dated January 31, 2020, between staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The sender informs colleagues that they received a call from Judge Nathan's clerk confirming that an 'Epstein 6(e) Order' has been signed and is ready for pickup from chambers. Rule 6(e) typically pertains to the secrecy of Grand Jury proceedings.
EFTA00014530.pdf
This document is a series of emails from July 29-30, 2019, between attorneys coordinating a meeting in New York. The meeting is scheduled to coincide with a status conference for Jeffrey Epstein's criminal case on Wednesday, July 31, 2019. One attorney, representing victims, asks if Epstein will be present in court and requests a seat be saved, which the recipient declines due to court security rules. Crucially, the victim's attorney mentions they will be discussing a 'third victim' they represent who wishes to meet in August.
DOJ-OGR-00001668.jpg
This document is page 5 of a Government filing from July 28, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues against a defense proposal that would allow them to publicly name victims and witnesses, stating that such a request is broad, unjustified, and contrary to the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The text highlights the distinction between the previous Epstein protective order and the current case, emphasizing that victims should not fear reprisal or shaming by having their identities broadcast by the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00016177.jpg
This document is a transcript of an opening statement, likely from a defense attorney named Ms. Sternheim. She argues that an accuser, Carolyn, fabricated her story about Ghislaine's involvement, noting that Carolyn's initial lawsuits and FBI interview only mentioned Epstein and his assistant, Sarah Kellen. The attorney suggests that Carolyn's story changed to include Ghislaine only after Epstein's death, motivated by a multi-million dollar payment from a victim's fund.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019509.jpg
This document appears to be a proof page (page 21) from a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the filename 'Epst...'), included in a House Oversight Committee production. The text details the deep federal government connections of Edward Snowden's family, specifically focusing on his grandfather, Admiral Barrett, who was a high-ranking FBI official involved in CIA-FBI interrogations at Guantánamo. It highlights that in 2006, every member of Snowden's immediate family was employed by the federal government.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031616.jpg
An email chain from April 28, 2016, detailing a Reuters press inquiry regarding a lawsuit filed in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The chain shows Martin Weinberg forwarding the inquiry to Epstein, who then discusses it with Michael Wolff; Wolff comments that Trump could likely 'wave thus away' and offers his assistance, while Epstein dismisses the accuser as 'deranaged' [sic].
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031464.jpg
An email chain from April 2016 initiated by a Reuters reporter contacting Martin Weinberg for comment regarding a lawsuit alleging Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. Weinberg forwards this to Epstein, who forwards it to Michael Wolff. Wolff replies suggesting that 'Donald' (Trump) is the only person who can 'wave thus away' and offers his assistance to Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017202.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (dated draft 4.2.12) written by an attorney (historically identifiable as Alan Dershowitz) recounting the 'Quincy House Two' case at Harvard. It details the arrest of two students, Stork and Hagen, for screening the film *Deep Throat*, the subsequent protests, and the successful legal defense against District Attorney Droney, who was accused of acting as a censor. The text discusses the irony of censorship attempts and the disparity between legal rulings and public reality regarding obscenity.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014041.jpg
This document is page 62 of a legal article (Cassell et al.) included in House Oversight records. It argues that Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) rights should attach before formal charges are filed, explicitly using the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement in Florida as a case study where victims were denied consultation because charges were not formally filed. The text critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) position and references a 2011 letter from Senator Jon Kyl to Attorney General Eric Holder supporting the broader interpretation of victims' rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021521.jpg
This document is an FBI FD-350 form containing a newspaper clipping from The Palm Beach Post dated January 25, 2008. The article reports on a federal lawsuit filed by attorney Jeffrey Herman on behalf of a 14-year-old girl ('Jane Doe') and her parents against Jeffrey Epstein, seeking over $50 million for alleged sexual assault in 2005. The article details the allegations, including Epstein's preference for minors, and describes a counter-strategy by Epstein's legal team (Goldberger, Sanchez, Lefcourt) to discredit the plaintiffs by highlighting the parents' criminal history and alleging financial motivation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity