HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022302.jpg
4.05 MB
Extraction Summary
2
People
10
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Page from the federal register discussing rules and regulations
File Size:
4.05 MB
Summary
This document from the Federal Register discusses the enforcement of a rule requiring employers to post a notice of employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). It addresses jurisdictional complexities for religiously-affiliated employers and exempts the U.S. Postal Service from the rule, while outlining enforcement mechanisms like treating non-compliance as an unfair labor practice rather than relying on voluntary compliance or monetary fines.
Organizations (10)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Board | ||
| NLRB | ||
| Ecclesiastical Maintenance Service | ||
| St. Edmund's High School | ||
| Ukiah Valley Medical Center | ||
| United States Postal Service | ||
| Republic Steel Corp. | ||
| National Employment Law Project | ||
| Public Justice Center, Inc. | ||
| General Counsel |
Relationships (3)
United States Postal Service
→
is excluded by The Board from coverage under the final notice-posting rule.
→
The Board
The Board
→
examines jurisdictional issues on a case-by-case basis.
→
religiously-affiliated employers
The Board's General Counsel
→
has unreviewable discretion on issuing complaints in unfair labor practice proceedings and can dismiss charges against employers not covered by The Board's jurisdiction.
→
The Board
Key Quotes (3)
"The rule requires employers to inform employees of their NLRA rights because the Board believes that employees must know their rights in order to exercise them effectively."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022302.jpg
Quote #1
"As it explained in the NPRM, the Board expects that most employers that fail to post the required notice will do so simply because they are unaware of the rule, and that when it is called to their attention, they will comply without the need for formal administrative action or litigation."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022302.jpg
Quote #2
"As the Board also explained in the NPRM, it did not consider imposing monetary fines for noncompliance, because the Board lacks the statutory authority to impose "penalties or fines.""Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022302.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document