DOJ-OGR-00003001.jpg

742 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

1
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / court memorandum
File Size: 742 KB
Summary

This document is page 67 of a legal filing (Document 204) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on April 16, 2021. The text contains legal arguments regarding the interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3283, specifically debating whether a 'categorical approach' or 'fact-based approach' applies to defining offenses involving sexual abuse. The prosecution argues that the defendant's interpretation would contradict Congress's intent to broadly prosecute crimes against children.

People (1)

Name Role Context
The Defendant Defendant
Refers to Ghislaine Maxwell (based on Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The document discusses legal arguments advanced by the...

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
Second Circuit Court
Court of Appeals cited for legal precedent (Weingarten case).
Supreme Court Court
References the U.S. Supreme Court's application of the 'categorical approach' in past statutes.
Eighth Circuit Court
Court cited in United States v. Countentos.
Congress Legislative Body
Mentioned regarding their legislative intent to 'cast a wide net' against offenses involving children.
DOJ Government Agency
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00003001).

Relationships (1)

The Defendant Legal Adversaries United States Government
The document is a government filing arguing against legal interpretations advanced by the defendant.

Key Quotes (3)

"applying the categorical approach to Section 3283 would run contrary to Congress’s intention to “cast a wide net to ensnare as many offenses against children as possible.”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00003001.jpg
Quote #1
"the interpretation the defendant advances would lead to absurd outcomes, as many federal crimes involving the sexual abuse of minors do not contain, as an element, a requirement that the defendant commit a sex act with a minor."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00003001.jpg
Quote #2
"the phrase “sexual abuse” in Section 3283 refers to specific conduct, and not the statutory offenses charged in the Indictment."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00003001.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document