DOJ-OGR-00010126.jpg
757 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
6
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal declaration (court filing)
File Size:
757 KB
Summary
This document is the first page of a declaration by Stephen Gillers, a legal ethics professor at NYU, filed on April 6, 2012, in the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. Gillers outlines his qualifications and states he was asked to address whether attorneys for the firm Brune & Richard met their ethical obligations regarding the disclosure of a 'July 21 letter' and an investigation into 'Juror No. 1.' The document appears to be part of a larger Department of Justice release (DOJ-OGR stamp), though the specific text on this page relates to the Daugerdas tax fraud case rather than explicitly mentioning Epstein.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Stephen Gillers | Declarant / Law Professor |
Expert on legal ethics submitting the declaration.
|
| Paul M. Daugerdas | Defendant |
Named defendant in the case caption.
|
| William H. Pauley, III | Judge |
Presiding judge listed in the caption (The Honorable).
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
Subject of an investigation regarding disclosure obligations.
|
Organizations (6)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Court where the document was filed.
|
|
| New York University School of Law |
Employer of Stephen Gillers.
|
|
| American Bar Association |
Professional organization mentioned in Gillers' qualifications.
|
|
| ABA's Center for Professional Responsibility |
Organization where Gillers is active.
|
|
| Brune & Richard |
Law firm whose attorneys' ethical obligations are being questioned.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by the footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the District Court and NYU.
|
Relationships (2)
I am a law professor at New York University School of Law
investigation into Juror No. 1
Key Quotes (2)
"whether the attorneys for Brune & Richard involved in this matter would have satisfied their ethical obligations if they failed to disclose the contents of the July 21 letter and their complete investigation into Juror No. 1."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010126.jpg
Quote #1
"I have been asked, therefore, to address any disclosure duty in March, May, and July of 2011."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010126.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document