EFTA00014881.pdf

74.3 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain / legal correspondence
File Size: 74.3 KB
Summary

This document is an email chain from November 2021 involving attorney Joe Nascimento. He informs a recipient named Alison that a redacted individual was served a subpoena in the case 'Melissa Selinger v. Kimera Labs' specifically to connect them to actions taken while working for Jeffrey Epstein. The emails discuss the legal maneuvering, including a motion to quash the deposition and the inclusion of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in court filings.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Joe Nascimento Attorney
Sender of the original email regarding the subpoena; Partner at Amsel Raben Nascimento, PLLC.
Alison Recipient
Addressed in the email from Joe Nascimento regarding the legal development.
Melissa Selinger Plaintiff
Plaintiff in the lawsuit Selinger v. Kimera Labs et al.
Alexander Jelinek Defendant
Named defendant in the lawsuit.
Jeffrey Epstein Deceased Financier
Mentioned as the reason a redacted individual is being dragged into the lawsuit (actions while working for Epstein).
[Redacted] Deponent/Subject
Served with a subpoena; their ex-husband is being sued; allegations attempt to connect them to Epstein.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Kimera Labs
Defendant in the lawsuit Melissa Selinger v. Kimera Labs.
Amsel Raben Nascimento, PLLC
Law firm representing the sender, Joe Nascimento.

Timeline (2 events)

2021-11-23
Email notification regarding the subpeona and legal motions.
Email
2021-11-30
Scheduled deposition date for the redacted individual (stayed by court order).
N/A

Locations (1)

Location Context
Address for Amsel Raben Nascimento, PLLC.

Relationships (2)

[Redacted] Employment/Association Jeffrey Epstein
Email states plaintiffs want to connect actions 'while working for Epstein'.
Joe Nascimento Professional/Legal Alison
Joe acts as legal counsel updating Alison on case developments.

Key Quotes (2)

"[Redacted] is getting dragged in because they want to connect [Redacted] to [Redacted] actions while working for Epstein."
Source
EFTA00014881.pdf
Quote #1
"The Plaintiffs have included a copy of the NPA, [Redacted] depo and have made numerous factual allegations related to Epstein in their motion."
Source
EFTA00014881.pdf
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document