| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Target victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Accuser subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DETECTIVE RECAREY
|
Investigator witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
John Brockman
|
Professional editorial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Eytan Avriel
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Marcinkova
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED] (Special Agent)
|
Subordinate supervisor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Joe Nascimento
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
SARAH
|
Scheduler recruiter |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Family outings to see plays like Phaedra and Endgame. | Philadelphia | View |
| N/A | N/A | Camping trips involving reading reading Henry Fielding aloud. | Camping sites | View |
| N/A | N/A | Family camping trips reading 18th-century novels. | Unknown (Camping locations) | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Deep Thinking Project | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Recruitment at Hollister store. | Wellington Green mall | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault during a massage | Epstein's property (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Family trips viewing plays (Phaedra, Endgame) and reading Joseph Andrews while camping. | Philadelphia (and camping l... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A gathering or publication featuring presentations/essays on Artificial Intelligence by various i... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-23 | N/A | Email notification regarding the subpeona and legal motions. | View | |
| 2021-04-12 | N/A | Trip to Durango, Colorado to interview victim/witness. | Durango, Colorado | View |
| 2020-07-16 | N/A | Proposed conference call regarding an update on the Epstein NY property. | Teleconference | View |
| 2006-07-25 | N/A | Detective Recarey filed a Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report detailing harassment of wi... | Palm Beach Police Department | View |
| 2006-07-25 | N/A | Alison was approached and offered money to refuse police cooperation. | Unknown | View |
| 2005-10-11 | N/A | Detectives Recarey and Dawson meet with Alison to obtain a sworn taped statement regarding Jeffre... | Unknown (police interview c... | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Alison begins visiting Epstein's house; first session involving partial nudity and payment. | Epstein's house | View |
| 0011-09-01 | N/A | Alison is pulled over/stopped by police; a patrol officer checks the vehicle; mention of a 'dime ... | Unknown road/location | View |
This document is an email thread between a Detective from the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force and a witness/victim. In the most recent email (March 2023), the witness apologizes for refusing to testify previously due to fear and asks if it is possible to visit Ghislaine Maxwell in prison to seek closure. The thread also contains older correspondence from March and April 2021 regarding the scheduling of interviews and the witness's hesitation to speak without lawyer consultation.
This document is an email chain from April 6, 2021, between USANYS staff members Alison and Ed regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Alison requests and receives approval to travel to Durango, Colorado, from April 12-15, 2021, with case agents to interview a victim and potential trial witness.
This document is a chain of emails between Jeff Jocks (attorney for Interlochen Center for the Arts) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) spanning from February 2020 to November 2021. The SDNY issued subpoenas seeking records of tuition payments made by Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell to Interlochen. Jeff Jocks confirmed that Interlochen retains financial records for only seven years and that a search of their files revealed no payments from Epstein or his entities.
This document is an email chain from March and April 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and legal counsel for the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Marc Weinstein and Andy Tomback). The correspondence discusses scheduling a conference call and clarifies the Estate's assertion of attorney-client privilege. Specifically, the SDNY asks if the Estate asserts privilege over a computer originally seized by the Palm Beach Police Department in 2005 (now in FBI possession), to which Weinstein confirms the Estate does assert privilege.
This document is an email chain from July 28 to August 3, 2020, between SDNY prosecutors (including an AUSA and Alison) and UK defense attorneys from Blackfords LLP (Gary Bloxsome, Jennifer Richardson). The correspondence negotiates the terms of a voluntary interview for a Blackfords client (unnamed in text, but contextually relevant to Prince Andrew) in connection with 'US v Maxwell'. Key topics include protections against evidence use outside the Maxwell case, immunity comparable to MLAT proceedings, elements of 18 U.S.C. 1001 (False Statements), and the extension of a 'Negotiation Period' to August 10, 2020.
This document is an email chain from July 16, 2020, involving Marc A. Weinstein of Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP and recipients identified as Alex, Alison, and Maurene. The discussion concerns scheduling a call to provide an update on the 'Epstein NY property' likely related to the administration or sale of the estate following Jeffrey Epstein's death.
This document is a chain of email correspondence between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Jeff Jocks, counsel for Interlochen Center for the Arts, regarding subpoenas served between February 2020 and March 2021. The SDNY sought records of tuition payments made by Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell for students at the school. Interlochen's counsel confirmed that the school only retains tuition records for seven years and that a search of their files yielded no evidence of payments by Epstein or his entities.
This document contains a chain of emails between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Mexico (USANM) and the Southern District of New York (SDNY) spanning from August 2019 to May 2021. The correspondence focuses on coordinating the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, specifically regarding his activities and properties in New Mexico (Zorro Ranch). Key topics include an agreement with the NM State Attorney General to defer sex trafficking investigations to the feds, questions for victim interviews specific to NM, the impact of Ghislaine Maxwell's 2020 indictment on asset forfeiture, and media handling of allegations involving 'Jane Doe 15' and references to Bill Clinton.
This document is an email chain from November 2021 involving attorney Joe Nascimento. He informs a recipient named Alison that a redacted individual was served a subpoena in the case 'Melissa Selinger v. Kimera Labs' specifically to connect them to actions taken while working for Jeffrey Epstein. The emails discuss the legal maneuvering, including a motion to quash the deposition and the inclusion of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in court filings.
This document contains pages 80 and 81 from the book 'Filthy Rich,' stamped as a House Oversight document. It details the Palm Beach Police Department's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, specifically noting that his home appeared 'scrubbed' before a search warrant was executed. The text highlights the unusual counter-surveillance tactics employed by Epstein's defense, including hiring private investigators to tail detectives Reiter and Recarey and search their trash.
This document is page 80 from a James Patterson book detailing the Palm Beach Police Department's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It describes a police search of Epstein's home where officers found Alison's high school transcript and noted the presence of non-relative young women, specifically naming Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova. The text highlights Chief Reiter's suspicion that the house had been 'scrubbed' or tidied up before the police arrived, suggesting Epstein had been tipped off.
This document is a scanned excerpt (pages 76-77) from the book 'Filthy Rich', contained within a House Oversight evidence file. It details a graphic account by a victim named 'Alison' regarding a sexual assault involving Jeffrey Epstein and Nadia Marcinkova, for which Alison was paid $1,000. The text also describes the police investigation led by Detective Recarey and Officer Pagan, noting that corroborating statements from girls like Wendy Dobbs led 'Reiter' to decide there was sufficient evidence for a search warrant.
This document appears to be a page from a book (Chapter 17) or a narrative report detailing a police interview on October 11, 2005, with a victim named 'Alison'. The text describes Alison's statement to Detectives Recarey and Dawson, detailing how she began visiting Epstein's house in 2002 (at a minor age), the progression of sexual acts, payments of $200, and the involvement of an assistant named Sarah and an associate named Marcinkova in sexual activities.
This document is an excerpt (pages 66-67) from a narrative book, likely 'Filthy Rich' by James Patterson, included in House Oversight files. It details Chief Michael Reiter reviewing evidence on October 3, 2005, specifically noting that Wendy Dobbs procured six underage girls for Epstein and that phone numbers were recovered from trash at El Brillo way. The text mentions a victim named Alison alleging a rape-like encounter and describes detectives Recarey and Frick visiting a potential witness named Jenny.
This document appears to be an excerpt from James Patterson's book (likely 'Filthy Rich') submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019154). It contains a transcript of an interview between 'D' and a victim 'V' (likely Virginia Roberts Giuffre based on the Hollister/Wellington Green details). 'V' describes being recruited by a co-worker named Alison at the Wellington Green mall to give massages to Jeffrey Epstein for $200 to buy a plane ticket to Maine. The text describes her skepticism about the legitimacy of the offer and mentions being introduced to Epstein's 'girlfriends' or 'slaves,' including a woman named Sarah.
This document is a scanned page (p. 36) from a James Patterson book (likely 'Filthy Rich') included in House Oversight Committee evidence files. The text describes the early, quiet phases of Chief Reiter's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, noting how rumors began to spread through Palm Beach society. It details a specific event on September 11 where a girl named Alison was stopped by police (possibly for drug possession/dime bag) and subsequently provided information linking her to Jeffrey Epstein, similar to another victim named Mary.
This document appears to be pages 34 and 35 from a book (possibly a true crime account like 'Filthy Rich'), stamped as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. The text describes September 11, 2005, when the local NBC affiliate WPTV received an anonymous phone tip from a nervous boy about a 'prostitution ring' in Palm Beach involving local high school girls. It also references the media landscape in Palm Beach, including the Palm Beach Daily News and Chief Reiter.
This document contains a page from a James Patterson book describing an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach, highlighting the urgency to find victims visiting his house on El Brillo Way. A second section, titled "Alison: September 11," describes media dynamics and mentions a tip received by WPTV regarding prostitution at a local high school.
This document is a page from an essay titled 'AIs VERSUS FOUR-YEAR-OLDS' by developmental psychologist Alison Gopnik. The text contrasts the capabilities of artificial intelligence with the learning processes of young children, arguing that children are superior learners despite their lack of planning skills. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, suggesting it was included in evidence files for a congressional investigation, likely related to the Edge Foundation or scientific networks associated with Jeffrey Epstein, though the text itself is purely academic.
This page contains a biographical profile of scientist Alison Gopnik, focusing on her research into child development, 'theory of mind,' and artificial intelligence (Bayesian models). It details her intellectual upbringing in Philadelphia and her work at her Berkeley lab. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of a larger government investigation, likely related to individuals (such as scientists) connected to the broader Epstein inquiry, though Epstein is not named on this specific page.
The author reflects on the founding of "The Reality Club" and relationships with pioneering computer scientists like Danny Hillis and Seth Lloyd, discussing historical developments in AI and complexity science. The text introduces "The Deep Thinking Project," a collaborative collection of essays from 25 prominent intellectuals addressing contemporary issues in artificial intelligence.
This document appears to be a page from a conference program or a collection of essays (likely associated with the Edge Foundation, given the list of contributors often associated with John Brockman and Epstein's circle). It lists titles and brief abstracts for presentations by intellectuals including Stephen Wolfram, George Church, and Alison Gopnik, focusing on the ethics, future, and artistic implications of Artificial Intelligence. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document is a biographical list of participants in a gathering or initiative called 'The Deep Thinking Project.' It features high-profile academics, scientists, and authors associated with institutions such as MIT, Harvard, Oxford, and UC Berkeley. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it is part of a congressional investigation, likely related to funding or connections involving Jeffrey Epstein's scientific patronage.
This document is a Penguin Press marketing summary for John Brockman's book 'Deep Thinking: Twenty-Five Ways of Looking at AI,' slated for publication on February 19, 2019. The text highlights Brockman's role in assembling prominent scientists and thinkers—such as Steven Pinker, Max Tegmark, and Stephen Wolfram—to discuss the implications of Artificial Intelligence. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp (016804), indicating it was gathered as evidence, likely due to Brockman's known association with Jeffrey Epstein.
This document contains pages 180-181 from a book (likely 'Filthy Rich') detailing the legal maneuvering and intimidation surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case. It describes the trauma of a victim named Mary, whose family faced surveillance and vandalism in Miami, and notes that prosecutors treated her ambiguously. The text also highlights Epstein's high-profile legal team, including Ken Starr, Gerald Lefcourt, and Alan Dershowitz, and mentions that another victim, Alison, never testified.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Implied Epstein/A... | Alison Gopnik | $0.00 | Alison was told she would be compensated (money... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Alison Gopnik | $1,000.00 | Payment after sexual assault/massage incident. | View |
| 2006-07-01 | Received | Epstein Associate | Alison Gopnik | $0.00 | Offer of compensation if she refused to coopera... | View |
| 2002-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Alison Gopnik | $200.00 | Payment for the first massage session. | View |
She told him she had been in touch with Epstein and offered money to refuse to cooperate.
Alison tells V she can get plane ticket money quickly by giving a guy a massage for $200.
Alison tells cops a story involving Jeffrey Epstein.
Forwarding an email from a witness asking about speaking to Ghislaine Maxwell. Detective asks to chat about the response.
Approved
Requesting approval to travel to Durango, CO to interview a victim/witness for the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
Alison providing testimony about her interactions with Epstein.
Alison described an encounter that sounded very much like a rape.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity