DOJ-OGR-00010403.jpg
730 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
730 KB
Summary
This legal document is a court opinion denying a defendant's post-trial motions. The court rejects the defendant's argument that a witness's (Jane's) testimony caused "ultimate prejudice" leading to improper convictions on Mann Act counts. The court also denies the defendant's claim of prejudicial pre-indictment delay, stating that the defendant failed to meet the stringent two-part legal test required to prove such a claim.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane | Witness |
Mentioned in the context of her testimony, which the Defendant argued resulted in prejudice.
|
| Kaplan |
Mentioned in a legal citation: "See Kaplan, 490 F.3d at 130."
|
|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned in a legal citation related to the Defendant's arguments: "Maxwell Br. at 18" and "Maxwell, 534 F. Supp. 3d...
|
| Kate | Witness |
Mentioned in the context of limiting instructions given at the time of her testimony.
|
| Annie | Witness |
Mentioned in the context of limiting instructions given at the time of her testimony.
|
| Cornielle |
Mentioned in a legal citation: "United States v. Cornielle, 171 F.3d 748, 751 (2d Cir. 1999))."
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | government agency |
Referenced throughout as the decision-making body, explaining its reasoning for denying the Defendant's claims.
|
| Government | government agency |
Mentioned as the prosecuting party, accused by the Defendant of excessive and prejudicial delay.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the jurisdiction whose law could form the predicate for the Mann Act counts.
|
|
|
Mentioned as a jurisdiction whose law could not form the predicate for the Mann Act counts.
|
Key Quotes (4)
"ultimate prejudice"Source
— Defendant
(The Defendant's characterization of the result of Jane's testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00010403.jpg
Quote #1
"illegal sexual activity"Source
— Court
(A legal term on which the jury had been instructed, making further limiting instructions for Kate's and Annie's testimony unnecessary.)
DOJ-OGR-00010403.jpg
Quote #2
"substantial prejudice"Source
— Court
(The standard of prejudice the Court states the Defendant has not shown, which would be required to merit the vacatur of the Mann Act counts.)
DOJ-OGR-00010403.jpg
Quote #3
"the statute of limitations is ‘the primary guarantee against bringing overly stale criminal charges,’"Source
— Court (quoting precedent)
(The Court's explanation for why the Defendant must satisfy a stringent test for a pre-indictment delay claim.)
DOJ-OGR-00010403.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document