DOJ-OGR-00009264.jpg
951 KB
Extraction Summary
13
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
5
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
951 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of U.S. v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Conrad, by attorneys Mr. Gair and Mr. Schectman. The questioning focuses intensely on a letter Conrad wrote to attorney Mr. Okula, specifically her choice of postage stamp and her decision to capitalize the words "our government," probing her motivations and opinions about other individuals involved in the case.
People (13)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| PAUL M. DAUGERDAS | Defendant |
Named in the case title, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.
|
| Conrad | Witness |
The person being questioned throughout the transcript (also referred to as Ms. Conrad).
|
| MR. OKULA | Attorney |
An attorney present in court, making objections and being addressed by the court and other counsel. He is also the re...
|
| Judge | Judge |
Presiding over the court proceedings, referred to as 'THE COURT' and 'Judge'.
|
| Mr. Gair | Attorney |
An attorney questioning the witness, Conrad.
|
| Miss Davis |
Mentioned in a letter written by the witness: "I thought that you, Miss Davis and Mr. Hernandez did an outstanding jo...
|
|
| Mr. Hernandez |
Mentioned in a letter written by the witness: "I thought that you, Miss Davis and Mr. Hernandez did an outstanding jo...
|
|
| Mr. Brubaker |
Mentioned in a question to the witness: "Did you believe that Mr. Brubaker was an idiot?"
|
|
| Mr. Parse |
Mentioned in a question to the witness: "Did you believe Mr. Parse was just stupid?"
|
|
| MR. ROTERT | Defense Counsel |
Identified as a defense counsel who declines to question the witness.
|
| Ms. Guerin |
Mentioned by Mr. Rotert, who states he has "no inquiry for Ms. Guerin."
|
|
| MR. SCHECTMAN | Attorney |
An attorney who conducts a brief direct examination of the witness, Ms. Conrad.
|
| Ms. Conrad | Witness |
The witness being questioned, identified by Mr. Schectman.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | government agency |
The plaintiff in the case title.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS | company |
Listed at the bottom of page 204, likely the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location where the witness was suspended and previously testified at voir dire.
|
|
|
Mentioned in the context of the Southern District of New York.
|
Relationships (5)
Conrad is a witness being questioned by multiple attorneys, including Mr. Okula's colleague Mr. Schectman. Conrad also wrote a letter to Mr. Okula, which is a key piece of evidence being discussed.
Mr. Gair is an attorney conducting a cross-examination of the witness, Conrad, questioning her motives and credibility.
Mr. Schectman is an attorney conducting a direct examination of the witness, Conrad.
Mr. Okula
→
professional
→
Mr. Rotert
Both are identified as defense lawyers in the same proceeding.
Mr. Okula
→
professional
→
Mr. Schectman
Both are defense lawyers in the same proceeding.
Key Quotes (2)
"Sorry. You're going a little too far here, Mr. Gair."Source
— Conrad
(The witness's response when being questioned by Mr. Gair about the specific stamp she used on a letter.)
DOJ-OGR-00009264.jpg
Quote #1
"I thought that you, Miss Davis and Mr. Hernandez did an outstanding job on behalf of our government."Source
— Conrad
(A quote from a letter written by the witness, which is being read back to her during questioning.)
DOJ-OGR-00009264.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document