DOJ-OGR-00019426.jpg
591 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
591 KB
Summary
This document is a legal filing, likely part of an appeal brief, dated September 24, 2020. The filing argues that the appellate court should overturn Judge Nathan's decision and modify a criminal protective order. The purpose of the modification is to allow Ms. Maxwell to share sealed information with Judge Preska regarding how the government obtained her deposition transcripts, which Judge Preska is considering unsealing.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Mentioned as the judge whose order is being appealed for refusing to modify a protective order.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Litigant |
The individual seeking to modify a protective order to share information with Judge Preska.
|
| Judge Preska | Judge |
The judge with whom Ms. Maxwell wishes to share information under seal. Mentioned as having an order for unsealing a ...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | government agency |
Referred to as 'this Court', the body hearing the appeal and being asked to permit modification of a criminal order.
|
Timeline (3 events)
An appeal of Judge Nathan's order which refused to modify a protective order.
A request for a writ of mandamus to compel the modification of a protective order.
A potential unsealing of a deposition transcript by order of Judge Preska.
Relationships (2)
Ms. Maxwell is appealing an order made by Judge Nathan in a legal case.
Ms. Maxwell is seeking permission to share information with Judge Preska related to a legal matter, specifically a deposition transcript that Judge Preska may unseal.
Key Quotes (1)
"Whether Judge Nathan erred in refusing to modify the protective order for the limited purpose of allowing Ms. Maxwell to share with Judge Preska, under seal, [REDACTED]"Source
— The author of the document
(Stated under the 'Issue Presented' section, defining the core legal question of the appeal.)
DOJ-OGR-00019426.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document