DOJ-OGR-00008352.jpg
548 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
548 KB
Summary
This court transcript from a pretrial conference on December 10, 2021, documents several procedural discussions. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, successfully requests a limited exclusion from Rule 615 to allow his witnesses (Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus) to review another witness's (Dr. Rocchio's) testimony. The court also establishes a deadline for the government to provide its witness list and confirms with both the prosecution (Ms. Comey) and defense (Ms. Sternheim) that no plea offers have been communicated.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney (for the government) |
Responds to the court regarding the witness list and confirms no plea offers were made.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, asking questions about witness lists and plea offers.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Raises an issue regarding sequestration and requests a limited exclusion from Rule 615 to share testimony among witne...
|
| Dr. Rocchio | Witness |
Mentioned as the source of testimony that Mr. Pagliuca wishes to share with other witnesses.
|
| Dr. Dietz | Witness |
Mentioned as a potential recipient of Dr. Rocchio's testimony.
|
| Dr. Loftus | Witness |
Mentioned as a potential recipient of Dr. Rocchio's testimony.
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney (for the government) |
States that the government has no objection to Mr. Pagliuca's request regarding witness testimony.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney (for the defense) |
Addressed by the court to confirm that no plea offers were communicated.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.
|
| The Government | government agency |
A party in the legal case, represented by Mr. Rohrbach and Ms. Comey.
|
| The Defense | legal team |
The party to whom plea offers would have been communicated.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-12-10
A court hearing where procedural matters were discussed, including an exception to witness sequestration (Rule 615), the deadline for submitting a witness list, and confirmation that no plea offers had been made.
Courtroom (unspecified)
Relationships (3)
Both are addressed by the court regarding the defense's side of the case, suggesting they are part of the same legal team.
Both speak on behalf of "the government," indicating they are colleagues on the prosecution team.
Mr. Pagliuca is managing the testimony of Dr. Rocchio, indicating an attorney-witness relationship.
Key Quotes (3)
"I was hoping to be able to provide a copy of Dr. Rocchio's testimony to either Dr. Dietz or Dr. Loftus, because I anticipate there may be issues that come up that they need to address during their testimony. And so for that purpose I would ask for a limited exclusion from Rule 615 for those witnesses."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Requesting an exception to the witness sequestration rule to allow expert witnesses to review each other's testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00008352.jpg
Quote #1
"That's fine with the government, your Honor."Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Agreeing on behalf of the government to Mr. Pagliuca's request for a limited exclusion from Rule 615.)
DOJ-OGR-00008352.jpg
Quote #2
"None were communicated, your Honor."Source
— MS. COMEY
(Responding to the Court's inquiry about whether any plea offers were communicated to the defense.)
DOJ-OGR-00008352.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document