Dr. Dietz
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Case related |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Defense
|
Expert witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Professional peers |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Potential expert witness |
1
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00017958.jpg
This document is page 85 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of an expert witness named Rocchio, who confirms they are testifying as a 'blind expert' regarding the topic of grooming and subject matter expertise, without having evaluated any specific parties or witnesses in the case. The questioning explores potential professional disagreements with other experts like Dr. Dietz and Dr. O'Donohue.
DOJ-OGR-00014880.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Judge sets a firm hearing date for November 15th to discuss jury questionnaires and motions in limine, specifically mentioning defense motions regarding co-conspirator statements, 'alleged victim 3', and Exhibit 52. The court also plans to address government motions seeking to exclude testimony from experts Dr. Loftus and Dr. Dietz.
DOJ-OGR-00008352.jpg
This court transcript from a pretrial conference on December 10, 2021, documents several procedural discussions. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, successfully requests a limited exclusion from Rule 615 to allow his witnesses (Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus) to review another witness's (Dr. Rocchio's) testimony. The court also establishes a deadline for the government to provide its witness list and confirms with both the prosecution (Ms. Comey) and defense (Ms. Sternheim) that no plea offers have been communicated.
DOJ-OGR-00008255.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Dec 8, 2021) discussing pre-trial motions in limine. The Court discusses the schedule for ruling on the Government's motion to exclude the testimony of defense expert witnesses Drs. Loftus and Dietz (likely Elizabeth Loftus and Park Dietz). The text also mentions disputes regarding Government Exhibit 52 and the introduction of co-conspirator statements, with a final pretrial conference scheduled for November 23.
DOJ-OGR-00020685.jpg
This document is a docket report from the SDNY for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 8-9, 2021. It details several filings, including the Government's opposition to bail reconsideration, a motion to preclude expert testimony from Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus, and letters regarding legal mail. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders scheduling a conference for November 10, 2021, denying the renewed request for bail, and establishing protocols for the defendant's transport and access to legal counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00020543.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries on November 8 and 9, 2021. It details various pre-trial motions and orders, including the denial of a renewed bail request, the scheduling of a conference regarding Rule 412 (evidence of sexual behavior) and expert witnesses (Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus), and orders regarding the humane transport of the defendant and delivery of legal mail. The document lists correspondence between the prosecution (AUSAs) and the Judge, as well as filings by the defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00020442.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), covering filings and orders on November 8 and 9, 2021. Key events include the denial of Maxwell's renewed request for bail, motions to preclude expert testimony from Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus, and the scheduling of a conference regarding Rule 412 (sexual behavior evidence) motions. The document also addresses logistical issues such as the delivery of legal mail to the MDC and humane transport protocols for the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00011663.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing procedural discussions in a criminal case. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, requests and receives permission from the government and court to share Dr. Rocchio's testimony with two other witnesses, Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. The court also sets a deadline of the upcoming Saturday for the government to provide its order-of-witness list and confirms with both the prosecution (Ms. Comey) and defense (Ms. Sternheim) that no plea offers have been communicated.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity