DOJ-OGR-00016876.jpg

593 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 593 KB
Summary

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a procedural discussion between the Court and counsel (Ms. Menninger and Ms. Moe) regarding witness testimony. Ms. Menninger explains why the defense did not seek anonymity for a witness, while Ms. Moe argues they had other options. The Court notes that the defense has been aware since October of another individual, Kelly, who was implicated by a witness named Jane in "sexualized massages" and subsequently noticed as a defense witness.

People (5)

Name Role Context
MS. MENNINGER Counsel
A speaker in the court transcript, likely representing the defense, explaining why a motion was not filed regarding a...
THE COURT Judge
A speaker in the court transcript, questioning counsel and making observations about the case.
MS. MOE Counsel
A speaker in the court transcript, likely representing the prosecution, adding a point about the defense's options.
Jane Witness
A witness mentioned by Ms. Menninger and the Court. She apparently provided information to the government and indicat...
Kelly Defense Witness
A person identified by the Court as having been noticed as a defense witness, allegedly involved in "sexualized massa...

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
government Government Agency
Mentioned as the entity to whom a witness (Jane) provided a last name and other information.
defense Legal Party
Referred to throughout the document as a party in the legal proceeding, represented by counsel like Ms. Menninger.
jury Legal Body
Mentioned by Ms. Moe in the context of ways the defense could have presented information.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion in court regarding the defense's handling of a witness's testimony and their awareness of another individual, Kelly, who was implicated by a witness named Jane.
Courtroom

Relationships (3)

MS. MENNINGER Professional THE COURT
Ms. Menninger is addressing the Court as counsel, answering questions about legal procedure.
MS. MOE Professional THE COURT
Ms. Moe is addressing the Court as counsel, offering a counterpoint to the defense's position.
Jane Associates (implied) Kelly
Jane indicated to the government that Kelly was involved in "sexualized massages".

Key Quotes (3)

"I did not with respect to this witness because I hadn't spoken to her."
Source
— MS. MENNINGER (Explaining to the Court why she did not file a motion for a witness to testify under her first name.)
DOJ-OGR-00016876.jpg
Quote #1
"There were a million different ways to get that before the jury, and they chose not to."
Source
— MS. MOE (Arguing that the defense had other options to introduce sensitive names into the record.)
DOJ-OGR-00016876.jpg
Quote #2
"Which just indicates that the defense has been on notice of this person, which I presume is what -- since October, as someone who Jane indicated was involved in the sexualized massages."
Source
— THE COURT (Observing that the defense was aware of an individual named Kelly long before the current discussion.)
DOJ-OGR-00016876.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document