KELLY

Person
Mentions
40
Relationships
8
Events
5
Documents
20
Also known as:
Kelly Melofthy

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
8 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Raheem
Legal representative
6
2
View
person JANE
Co participants
5
1
View
person George Carlin
Family
5
1
View
person JANE
Co present
5
1
View
person Cathy O'Brien
Family
5
1
View
person JANE
Corroborator
5
1
View
person JANE
Subjects of inquiry
1
1
View
person JE
Traveled together
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Crime Group sexualized encounters. N/A View
N/A N/A Group sexualized encounters Unspecified room View
2001-01-01 Legal case Raheem v. Kelly, 257 F.3d 122 (2d Cir. 2001) 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals View
1997-02-23 Flight Flight 948 from PBI to TEB. Between PBI and TEB View
1986-01-01 N/A Alleged sexual assault of Cathy O'Brien and her daughter Kelly by Bill and Bob Bennett. Bohemian Grove View

EFTA00026750.pdf

This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues for the entry of its proposed protective order regarding discovery materials, specifically opposing the defendant's request to publicly name victims who have previously spoken to the media and opposing restrictions on the Government's use of its own investigative materials. The document includes the full text of the proposed protective order, detailing how 'Confidential' and 'Highly Confidential' information (including sexualized imagery) must be handled by the defense.

Legal correspondence / proposed protective order
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00022269.tif

This document is a flight log detailing numerous flights primarily in October and November 2002. It records aircraft, routes, flight numbers, and passenger lists, including several instances of individuals identified as 'JE' and 'SK' traveling with various other individuals. The log also contains entries for simulator training and maintenance remarks.

Flight log
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017728.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The witness denies being shown photographs of several women (Sophie, Emmy, Michelle, Eva, Kelly) by the government. However, the witness confirms remembering being on flights with Prince Andrew and Mark Epstein, who is identified as Jeffrey's brother.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001687.jpg

This legal document, page 3 of a filing to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated July 29, 2020, presents the defense's argument against a government-proposed protective order in the case against Ms. Maxwell. The defense contends the order would impede their ability to investigate alleged victims and witnesses, citing legal precedents where individuals waived their privacy rights by making information public. The document asserts the need for a full investigation to challenge the credibility of accusers and mount an effective defense for their client, who is presumed innocent.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001665.jpg

This legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, is the government's argument against a defendant's request to publicly name victims of herself or Epstein. The government contends that such disclosure is inappropriate and violates victims' rights to privacy and safety, citing the Crime Victims' Rights Act and several legal precedents. The filing supports a proposed protective order that would prevent public identification of victims while still allowing the defense to prepare for trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016875.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a sidebar or discussion between the Judge, defense attorney Ms. Menninger, and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding '3500 material' (discovery) received on October 11th. The conversation focuses on the scope of testimony concerning a person named 'Kelly,' alleged involvement in massages, and the cross-examination of a witness referred to as 'Jane'.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016874.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) where defense attorney Ms. Menninger discusses efforts to subpoena a witness. The defense argues that a victim referred to as 'Jane' previously told the government that a woman named 'Kelly' could corroborate her story. The Judge requests specific details regarding the defense team's attempts to contact this witness.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015961.jpg

This document is a flight log page for aircraft N908JE, piloted by David Rodgers, detailing flights between January 21 and March 10, 1997. The log records numerous trips primarily between Palm Beach (PBI) and Teterboro (TEB), with additional flights to St. Maarten, Savannah, Santa Fe, and other locations. The initials 'JE' and 'GM' appear as passengers on nearly every flight, accompanied by a rotating cast of other named individuals.

Flight log
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017053.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of summations delivered by Ms. Moe on August 10, 2022. Ms. Moe discusses the testimony of a witness named Jane, who recalled five names (Emmy, Kelly, Sophie, Eva, and Michelle) of people present during group sexualized encounters. Ms. Moe defends the credibility of Jane's memory, arguing that as a child being sexually assaulted, her ability to recall only these names is understandable.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005793.jpg

This legal filing (Document 397 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) argues for the admissibility of expert testimony regarding sex trafficking, coercive control, and the psychological relationship between pimps and victims. It cites several precedents (Kelly, Torres, Randall, Dupigny) where such testimony was permitted. Specifically, it defends the qualifications of Dr. Rocchio, a Brown University professor with 25 years of clinical experience, noting that the defendant does not contest her expertise.

Legal filing (court document)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005850.jpg

This document is page 67 of a legal filing (Document 397) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The text outlines legal arguments regarding the admissibility of witness identification testimony, citing precedents such as *Neil v. Biggers* and *United States v. Simmons* to argue that even suggestive identification procedures do not require suppression if the identification is independently reliable based on the totality of circumstances. The page bears a Department of Justice footer stamp (DOJ-OGR-00005850).

Legal filing / court document (motion or brief)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005743.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically page 6 of 8 from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It outlines the legal standard for challenging the admissibility of identification testimony, citing several precedents like Raheem v. Kelly and Simmons v. United States. The text explains the two-part inquiry courts must use to determine if a pretrial identification procedure was unduly suggestive and, if so, whether the identification is still independently reliable based on factors established in Neil v. Biggers.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005740.jpg

This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists seven U.S. court cases, dating from 1967 to 2012, which are cited as legal precedent in the associated legal brief. The cases are from the U.S. Supreme Court and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014432.jpg

This document is a page from the closing summations of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), delivered by prosecutor Ms. Moe. She argues that the testimony of a victim identified as 'Jane' is credible despite her being a 'kid' at the time of the abuse. The text highlights that Jane recalled specific first names of individuals present during 'group sexualized encounters': Emmy, Kelly, Sophie, Eva, and Michelle.

Court transcript (summations/closing arguments)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005849.jpg

This document is a legal document related to case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It discusses the admissibility of identification evidence and cites several legal precedents related to eyewitness identification and due process.

Legal document
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027406.jpg

This document is a forensic extract of an iMessage conversation from September 2018 between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation focuses on US politics, specifically discussing Donald Trump, an op-ed, military obedience, and election strategies for Republicans. The text includes misogynistic remarks regarding a figure named 'Kelly' ('typical female form blabbed') and discusses tactical political moves like a 'pincer' strategy.

Digital forensic report / imessage log
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015381.jpg

The document appears to be an excerpt from a tribute or article (possibly 'Roasting With Robin') detailing the specific death and funeral wishes of comedian George Carlin. It outlines his desire for cremation, a strict lack of religious services, and a private, informal gathering with Rhythm and Blues music. It includes quotes from his daughter, Kelly, enforcing the secular nature of the event, and concludes with a humorous quote from Carlin about wanting to explode spontaneously. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp.

Article excerpt / biography / email attachment
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015259.jpg

This document page, stamped with a House Oversight footer, contains excerpts attributed to Cathy O'Brien. The text details allegations of severe abuse, sexual assault, and 'mind control programming' committed by Bill and Bob Bennett against O'Brien and her daughter at Bohemian Grove in 1986 and at a NASA facility. The text includes bizarre claims regarding aliens and interdimensional beings.

Excerpt from testimony/book (likely 'trance formation of america') included in house oversight records
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015242.jpg

This document page, stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015242, contains a narrative excerpt describing a conflict between Mark Phillips and an individual named 'Beldo'. It quotes a threatening letter from Phillips to Beldo, written in response to a negative review of Phillips' and Cathy O'Brien's book. In the letter, Phillips claims to have placed Beldo on a list of 'potentially dangerous sexual predators' monitored by law enforcement and warns Beldo to stay away from children.

Correspondence excerpt / congressional exhibit
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014207.jpg

This document is a page from an address book, likely Jeffrey Epstein's 'Black Book', containing contact information for high-profile individuals including Senator George Mitchell, Marvin Minsky (MIT), and Nathan Myhrvold. The page lists addresses, extensive phone numbers, email addresses, and support staff details (pilots, assistants). Notably, it includes a handwritten annotation for 'Lola Wexner' under N.A. Property, Inc., and lists an address for Robert Meister at the World Trade Center.

Contact list / address book page
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity