DOJ-OGR-00003018.jpg
884 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
884 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on April 16, 2021, is a rebuttal to a defendant's accusation that the Government delayed an indictment for tactical advantage. The author contrasts the Government's decision to stay the civil case of *Doe v. Indyke* with its inaction in the settled case of *Giuffre v. Maxwell*, arguing the different procedural postures and the risk of witness deposition in the active *Doe* case justified the different legal strategies. The document asserts that the Government's actions were logical and not part of a conspiracy to gain an advantage in the criminal case.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Doe | Plaintiff |
Mentioned as the plaintiff in the case Doe v. Indyke.
|
| Indyke | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in the case Doe v. Indyke.
|
| Giuffre | Plaintiff |
Mentioned as the plaintiff in the case Giuffre v. Maxwell.
|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in the case Giuffre v. Maxwell.
|
| Judge Freeman | Judge |
Recipient of a letter from the Government regarding the Doe v. Indyke case.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
A party in the legal proceedings, accused by the defendant of delaying an indictment for tactical advantage. The docu...
|
| Court | government agency |
The judicial body being addressed in the document, which the defendant urges to draw an inference about the Governmen...
|
Timeline (3 events)
The Government moved to intervene and stay the proceedings in Doe v. Indyke.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in a quote from a Government letter describing Doe v. Indyke as the 'lone case in this District that has no...
|
Relationships (3)
They are the opposing parties in the lawsuit Giuffre v. Maxwell.
The Government, as a litigant, communicated with Judge Freeman via a letter regarding a case.
Key Quotes (3)
"sharp contrast"Source
— defendant
(Used to describe the difference between the Government's actions in the Doe v. Indyke and Giuffre v. Maxwell civil cases.)
DOJ-OGR-00003018.jpg
Quote #1
"establish a strong inference that as long as the government stood to gain a tactical advantage by delaying the indictment . . ., it would not move to intervene."Source
— defendant
(The defendant's argument suggesting the Government's motive for its actions regarding civil cases and the timing of the indictment.)
DOJ-OGR-00003018.jpg
Quote #2
"lone case in this District that has not yet been either resolved or stayed at this point."Source
— Government
(A quote from the Government's letter to Judge Freeman, explaining the status of the Doe v. Indyke case.)
DOJ-OGR-00003018.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document