DOJ-OGR-00019078.jpg
480 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size:
480 KB
Summary
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (implied by case number). The testimony focuses on flight logs, specifically confirming that Mark Epstein does not appear on passenger lists with an individual referred to as 'Jane'. Rodgers admits to writing 'one female' in logs for unknown passengers and acknowledges that while these entries *could* refer to Jane, he cannot confirm it definitively. The testimony establishes Jane first appears in logs in 1996, with no records in 1994 or 1995.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rodgers | Witness |
Person being cross-examined; pilot or log keeper who wrote entries like 'one female'.
|
| Mark Epstein | Subject of inquiry |
Brother of Jeffrey Epstein; discussed regarding whether he was on flights with 'Jane'.
|
| Jane | Subject of inquiry |
Likely a pseudonym for a victim/witness; discussed regarding presence on flight logs in 1994, 1995, and 1996.
|
| Unidentified Attorney | Interrogator |
Person asking the questions (Q).
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Inferred from Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
Relationships (2)
Witness confirms they did not see Mark Epstein's name on flights with Jane.
Attorney asks: 'instances where you wrote "one female"'
Key Quotes (3)
"You're not aware of any other flight where someone with Jane's first name or first and last name ever flew with Mark Epstein; right? ... Correct."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019078.jpg
Quote #1
"Now, you mentioned that, occasionally, you write one female for someone you don't know who happens to be a female passenger; right?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019078.jpg
Quote #2
"But sitting here today, you can't say that any one of those instances where you wrote 'one female' was actually Jane flying on that flight; right? ... It could have been."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019078.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document