Unidentified Attorney
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Witness examiner |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Witness counsel |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Witness examiner |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Witness examiner |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Flatley
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00035382.pdf
This document contains an email thread from July 24, 2019, between the Regional Director of the Northeast Region and the Associate Warden of MCC New York regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The Associate Warden reports that Epstein (Inmate #76318-054) was removed from Suicide Watch and moved to Psychological Observation, followed by a medical assessment and a meeting with his attorney. This update was in response to a request from the Regional Director for daily updates on the inmate's status and activities.
DOJ-OGR-00018299.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of a witness named Parkinson in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The testimony establishes that specific videos and photographs of the Palm Beach residence were taken on October 20, 2005, by the witness. The questioning highlights that these images do not reflect the state of the house in 1994, at which time the witness states they were working at 'West Palm'.
DOJ-OGR-00018298.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Parkinson. The testimony details the execution of a search warrant on October 20, 2005, specifically confirming Parkinson's role in videotaping the search (warrant reading, security sweep, walk-through) and identifying Kim Paveolic as the photographer.
DOJ-OGR-00018096.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Alessi. Alessi confesses to breaking into Mr. Epstein's home via a sliding door during a time of financial hardship. He admits to going to the 'lake room' and stealing a band of hundred-dollar bills totaling $6,300 from a luggage bag near Epstein's desk.
DOJ-OGR-00018087.jpg
This document is page 890 of a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi testifies that Ghislaine Maxwell provided 'exotic oils' from other countries for Jeffrey Epstein's massages, which Alessi stored in Epstein's bathroom. The testimony also details that Alessi was never present during the massages, the doors were always closed, and his role involved entering afterward to clean up and retrieve the massage table from a closet in Epstein's bathroom.
DOJ-OGR-00017992.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Alessi - Direct) filed on August 10, 2022. The witness, Mr. Alessi, describes the layout of a master suite in an Epstein property, detailing a projection TV system and sliding doors to a pool balcony. Crucially, the testimony establishes that Ms. Maxwell had a dedicated, large bathroom ('bath number four') situated at the entrance to the master bedroom.
DOJ-OGR-00017911.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, an expert witness, who defines the concept of 'grooming' and outlines its five distinct stages, including victim selection, isolation, building trust through deception, desensitization, and maintaining control for coercion.
DOJ-OGR-00017903.jpg
This document is page 30 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, a forensic psychologist, who testifies about their professional background, explaining that they provide independent evaluations for both prosecution/plaintiff and defense sides. Dr. Rocchio confirms holding psychology licenses in Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and New York.
DOJ-OGR-00017810.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the redirect examination of a witness named 'Jane' in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Jane testifies about her application to Interlochen, confirming that while she was having severe difficulties at home, her recommendation letters from teachers did not reflect this because she was 'very good at hiding' the abuse. The attorney directs Jane to look at Defendant's Exhibit J-3.
DOJ-OGR-00014982.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Cross-examination of witness Rocchio) filed on January 15, 2025, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The questioning focuses on Rocchio's qualifications as a forensic psychologist, specifically challenging whether they were explicitly qualified as an expert on 'grooming' in previous cases. Rocchio argues that grooming falls under 'interpersonal violence,' but admits to only testifying as a forensic psychologist approximately six times and being deposed four times.
DOJ-OGR-00014962.jpg
This is page 86 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on January 15, 2025. It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio (likely a clinical expert), who is testifying about the importance of asking patients about their disclosure history regarding child sexual abuse. The witness explains that delayed disclosure often correlates with a lack of immediate medical care and that the response a victim receives upon disclosure significantly impacts outcomes.
DOJ-OGR-00014956.jpg
This document is page 80 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the direct examination of an expert witness named Rocchio. The testimony focuses on the psychological reasons abuse victims may not report crimes immediately, including shame, affection for the abuser, and fear of consequences. The witness defines the concept of 'delayed disclosure' specifically regarding sexual assault.
DOJ-OGR-00014922.jpg
This document is page 46 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The witness, Rocchio, is testifying about an academic study regarding 'coercive control' and victimization tactics. The Judge interrupts to ask specifically about the comparison between 'trauma bonding' and the relationship between a pimp and a sex worker.
DOJ-OGR-00014919.jpg
This document is page 43 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony focuses on the methodology of empirical studies regarding childhood sexual abuse, specifically addressing how professionals handle varying definitions of 'grooming' by looking for commonalities and overlaps between offender admissions and victim experiences. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00014915.jpg
This document is page 39 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, a forensic expert, who explains that forensic evaluations do not automatically assume a victim's report is true. Dr. Rocchio details the methodology used to objectively assess claims, including reviewing literature, administering psychological tests, and cross-referencing third-party information to identify consistencies or inconsistencies regarding alleged sexual abuse and grooming.
DOJ-OGR-00014907.jpg
This document is page 31 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 01/15/25) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Rocchio. The witness defines 'grooming the environment' as a tactic where sexual offenders manipulate a child's parents or community institutions (citing the Boy Scouts as an example) to gain trust, respectability, and access to victims. The testimony outlines the psychological strategies used to disarm guardians and normalize the offender's presence.
DOJ-OGR-00014906.jpg
Page 30 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Maxwell) filed on January 15, 2025. Witness Rocchio provides expert testimony defining 'grooming' as a series of tactics used by offenders to deceive children, build trust, and eventually abuse them. The testimony details strategies such as gaining access via organizations (e.g., schools, scouts), isolating victims, and using 'courtship' behaviors like gift-giving and affection to manipulate the child.
DOJ-OGR-00014887.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony covers Rocchio's professional background, specifically their graduate studies and a predoctoral fellowship at Yale University School of Medicine, focusing on their experience treating patients with severe mental health issues, traumatic stress, and childhood violence.
DOJ-OGR-00019025.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a pilot named Rodgers during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony details the fleet of aircraft owned by Epstein, specifically noting the purchase of a Boeing 727 in January 2001, the refurbishment of a Gulfstream, and the usage of a smaller Cessna for travel between Palm Beach, 'the ranch,' and St. Thomas.
DOJ-OGR-00019011.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, documenting the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers regarding flight logs. The witness confirms that Virginia Roberts (noted as VR), Jeffrey Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell were all passengers on a flight from Paris, France to Granada, Spain on March 8, 2001. The testimony also notes there were multiple other passengers on this flight.
DOJ-OGR-00018428.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The defense attorney questions Kate's memory reliability due to a ten-year period of substance abuse. Kate counters that her testimony relates to times she was sober, specifically stating she was required to not take drugs or be drunk when around Ghislaine and Jeffrey.
DOJ-OGR-00018416.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on her background as a musician and singer, her time living in the South of France at age 16 or 17, and her production of an album. The witness explicitly denies a suggestion by the attorney that she was discovered by the musician Seal at a piano bar.
DOJ-OGR-00019078.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (implied by case number). The testimony focuses on flight logs, specifically confirming that Mark Epstein does not appear on passenger lists with an individual referred to as 'Jane'. Rodgers admits to writing 'one female' in logs for unknown passengers and acknowledges that while these entries *could* refer to Jane, he cannot confirm it definitively. The testimony establishes Jane first appears in logs in 1996, with no records in 1994 or 1995.
DOJ-OGR-00016676.jpg
This document is page 193 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Aznaran. The witness testifies about their background, stating they entered the service in July 2008, attended an academy for four months, and were subsequently assigned to JFK Airport's passenger operations to process international travelers at the Federal Inspection Site (FIS). The witness notes they performed this role for three and a half years before moving to the Passenger Analysis Unit (PAU).
DOJ-OGR-00016640.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of expert witness Loftus (likely Elizabeth Loftus), who is testifying about the science of memory, specifically addressing how post-event information, personal motives, and the trustworthiness of information sources can influence the creation of false memories. The witness confirms that people are more likely to accept suggestive information if it fits their prior beliefs or comes from a trusted source.
Cross-examination regarding acting career
Questioning regarding the witness's 20-year career on a soap opera and specific dramatic tropes she has enacted (cancer, stalking, car crashes).
Direct Examination
Attorney asks witness to explain parental and family factors regarding abuse risk; witness details conflict, violence, financial difficulties, and isolation.
Direct Examination regarding memory science
Discussion regarding whether post-event information can be intentional or inadvertent, and the impact of secondary gain, motive, or trusted sources on the formation of false memories.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity