DOJ-OGR-00008267.jpg
655 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
655 KB
Summary
This legal document is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell arguing against the government's attempt to use her April 2016 deposition testimony. The core argument is that "Deposition Exhibit 13" is an unauthenticated photocopy and is fundamentally different from "Exhibit 52." This claim is supported by testimony from Mr. Alessi, who noted a significant physical discrepancy between Exhibit 52 and books he saw while employed by Mr. Epstein.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | The Honorable |
Addressed at the top of the letter.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Party in a legal case |
The document is written on her behalf, referencing her April 2016 deposition and arguments.
|
| Mr. Alessi | Witness |
Provided testimony that the Court deemed inadequate to authenticate an exhibit, comparing Exhibit 52 to books he saw ...
|
| Mr. Epstein | Employer |
Mr. Alessi was employed by him.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | Government agency |
Mentioned as having previously rejected the government's arguments and having heard testimony from Mr. Alessi.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2016-04
Ms. Maxwell's deposition where she gave testimony concerning Deposition Exhibit 13.
Mr. Alessi provided testimony explaining that Exhibit 52 was not the same as books he saw during his employment with Mr. Epstein.
Court
Relationships (2)
The document states Mr. Alessi saw certain books "during his employment with Mr. Epstein."
The document outlines Ms. Maxwell's legal arguments against the government's position in a court case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document