064.pdf
221 KB
Extraction Summary
29
People
11
Organizations
6
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / notice of compliance
File Size:
221 KB
Summary
This document is a 'Notice of Compliance' filed on July 28, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It pertains to multiple civil cases filed by 'Jane Doe' plaintiffs against Epstein. The filing states that while the court ordered the parties to agree on a preservation of evidence order, they were unable to reach a full agreement, leading Epstein to submit his own proposed order. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing the attorneys representing the various plaintiffs and defendants, including Sarah Kellen.
People (29)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in multiple civil lawsuits filed by Jane Doe plaintiffs.
|
| Jane Doe No. 2 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe No. 3 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe No. 4 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe No. 5 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe No. 6 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe No. 7 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80993-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| C.M.A. | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe No. II | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80469-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe No. 101 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 09-CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Jane Doe No. 102 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 09-CV-80656-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Robert D. Critton, Jr. | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein; Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman
|
| Michael J. Pike | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein; Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman
|
| Stuart S. Mermelstein | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993, 08-80994
|
| Adam D. Horowitz | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases
|
| Richard Horace Willits | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811
|
| Jack Scarola | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.
|
| Jack P. Hill | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.
|
| Bruce Reinhart | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen
|
| Sarah Kellen | Defendant |
Listed as a Defendant in the service list section for Bruce Reinhart
|
| Brad Edwards | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893
|
| Paul G. Cassell | Attorney |
Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe
|
| Isidro M. Garcia | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469
|
| Robert C. Josefsberg | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656
|
| Katherine W. Ezell | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656
|
| Jack Alan Goldberger | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
|
| Theodore J. Leopold | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804
|
| Spencer T. Kuvin | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804
|
Organizations (11)
Timeline (1 events)
2009-07-28
Filing of Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Notice of Compliance with Court Order (DE #192)
United States District Court Southern District of Florida
Locations (6)
Relationships (3)
Both listed as defendants in the service list; Sarah Kellen represented by Bruce Reinhart, Epstein by various counsel.
Service list explicitly states 'Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen' under Bruce Reinhart.
Signed the document as 'Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein'.
Key Quotes (5)
"Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned attorneys, in compliance with the Court's Order (DE #192) hereby submits a proposed order on Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (DE #114)"Source
064.pdf
Quote #1
"However the Court determined that the Plaintiffs proposed order was overly broad and directed that the parties attempt to submit an agreed order."Source
064.pdf
Quote #2
"However, we were unable to finalize an order."Source
064.pdf
Quote #3
"Therefore, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is providing his proposed order attached as Exhibit A."Source
064.pdf
Quote #4
"However, neither party, absent this Court's permission believed it was appropriate."Source
064.pdf
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document