DOJ-OGR-00009595.jpg

630 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing / legal opinion
File Size: 630 KB
Summary

This page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330) argues against a claim of multiplicity by distinguishing between two separate conspiracies involving the defendant. It details a 1990s scheme focused on grooming and mentoring victims for abuse at Epstein's properties, and a separate 2000s 'pyramid scheme' where victims were paid to recruit others for massage appointments.

People (3)

Name Role Context
The Defendant Accused
Refers to Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330); document discusses her crimes and defense arguments.
Epstein Co-conspirator
Mentioned in relation to 'Epstein's properties' where sexual abuse occurred.
Underage girls / Victims Victims
Targets of the sexual exploitation schemes.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
The Government
Presented arguments at trial regarding the distinct schemes.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Indicated by the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00009595.

Timeline (2 events)

1990s
First Scheme (Count Three)
Epstein's properties
2000s
Second Scheme (Count Five) / Pyramid Scheme
Florida (implied by context)
The Defendant Victims

Locations (3)

Location Context
Location associated with the conspiracy charged in Count Three (implied by contrast).
Location where the conspiracy charged in Count Five largely took place.
Destination where victims were groomed to travel for sexual abuse.

Relationships (2)

The Defendant Abuser/Victim Victims
establishing mentoring relationships with victims to groom them
Victims Recruitment Other Victims
victims recruited other victims for so-called 'massage' appointments

Key Quotes (4)

"pyramid scheme of abuse"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009595.jpg
Quote #1
"victims recruited other victims for so-called 'massage' appointments"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009595.jpg
Quote #2
"establishing mentoring relationships with victims to groom them to travel to Epstein’s properties for sexual abuse"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009595.jpg
Quote #3
"The locus of each count was distinct and weighs against a claim of multiplicity."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009595.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document