Epstein's properties
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00029847.pdf
This document is a legal filing by the Government opposing defense motions in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It primarily addresses Count Six (perjury), arguing that Maxwell's answers in a July 2016 deposition regarding 'sexual activities,' 'sex toys,' and 'massages' were false and not fundamentally ambiguous. The document also addresses and rejects defense requests for discovery regarding a victim's personal diary from 1996 and broad subpoenas for defendant's records.
DOJ-OGR-00021560.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) dated June 29, 2023, in which a judge is ruling on defense objections to specific paragraphs (79 and 81) of a report. The judge discusses Virginia's testimony regarding interactions at Epstein's properties, specifically noting that trial evidence disproved claims that Virginia was unaware of other victims. The judge overrules an objection regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's responsibility for sexualized massages performed by individuals brought by a woman named Carolyn, concluding that Maxwell's recruitment of Virginia set the broader scheme in motion.
DOJ-OGR-00019103.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, who was a pilot. The questioning establishes the significant role of an unnamed woman in Epstein's organization during the 1990s, describing her as 'Epstein's number 2' who managed large properties, staff, and pilots, and had the authority to approve expenses and vacation time.
DOJ-OGR-00016570.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of Ms. Espinosa. The questioning by Mr. Everdell focuses on Ms. Espinosa's past employment, the departure of Ghislaine, and the management of Epstein's properties by Sarah Kellen. An objection raised by Ms. Pomerantz regarding Sarah Kellen's marital status is sustained by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00013908.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Document 761, filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Espinosa. The witness describes their role in assisting Ghislaine Maxwell with the management of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, specifically noting a massive, never-ending project to get 'the island' up and running. The testimony highlights that Maxwell worked hard, managed contractors (landscapers, designers), and traveled to various properties on a weekly basis.
DOJ-OGR-00013519.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Cross-examination of witness Rodgers) filed in August 2022. The testimony establishes that an unnamed female manager (referred to as 'she' and Epstein's 'number 2') was responsible for managing Epstein's properties, renovations, and aviation staff during the 1990s. Specifically, she approved pilot expenses, vacation time, and served as the point of contact for aircraft maintenance issues.
DOJ-OGR-00009595.jpg
This page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330) argues against a claim of multiplicity by distinguishing between two separate conspiracies involving the defendant. It details a 1990s scheme focused on grooming and mentoring victims for abuse at Epstein's properties, and a separate 2000s 'pyramid scheme' where victims were paid to recruit others for massage appointments.
DOJ-OGR-00017493.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Cross-examination of witness Visoski) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on defining Ghislaine Maxwell's role within Jeffrey Epstein's operations, specifically characterizing her as Epstein's 'number 2' regarding household, property, and aircraft management, while explicitly excluding her from involvement in the 'business side' or finances.
DOJ-OGR-00017490.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski. The witness confirms that from the mid-1990s to the end of the decade, Ghislaine was an assistant to Epstein responsible for his properties. Visoski testifies that Ghislaine's duties included supervising the house managers and other staff to ensure the day-to-day management of the residences was handled.
DOJ-OGR-00011534.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 22, 2022, details a judge's ruling on objections made by the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The judge overrules objections regarding characterizations of the offense and Maxwell's responsibility for sexualized massages, citing trial evidence that contradicts her claims. The ruling concludes that evidence established Ms. Maxwell's recruitment of a person named Virginia, which initiated a broader recruitment scheme.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity