DOJ-OGR-00005509.jpg

696 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

1
People
1
Organizations
5
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 696 KB
Summary

This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, argues for the admissibility of evidence regarding minor victims' consent. It distinguishes the actual charges of "sexual activity" and "sex trafficking" from "sexual abuse," which is not charged. The document provides context by comparing the varying legal definitions of "minor" and ages of consent across different jurisdictions, including New York, Florida, the United Kingdom, France, and New Mexico.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Esquival-Quintana
Mentioned in the citation of the legal case 'Esquival-Quintana v. Sessions'.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
Supreme Court government agency
Cited as having noted that “state criminal codes aid our interpretation of ‘sexual abuse of a minor’ by offering usef...

Timeline (1 events)

2017
The Supreme Court case Esquival-Quintana v. Sessions, 137 S. Ct. 1562 (2017) was cited.

Locations (5)

Location Context
Cited as a jurisdiction that defines “minor” as a person under the age of 17.
Cited as a jurisdiction that defines “minor” as a person under the age of 18.
Cited as a jurisdiction that defines “minor” as a person under the age of 16.
Cited as a jurisdiction that defines “minor” as a person under the age of 15.
Cited as a jurisdiction that criminalizes sexual contact with a minor under 13, or 13 to 18 with coercion.

Key Quotes (4)

"consented to sexual abuse."
Source
— the accusers (The document states the government seeks to preclude evidence or argument that the accusers 'consented to sexual abuse.')
DOJ-OGR-00005509.jpg
Quote #1
"sexual activity"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005509.jpg
Quote #2
"sex trafficking"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005509.jpg
Quote #3
"state criminal codes aid our interpretation of ‘sexual abuse of a minor’ by offering useful context."
Source
— The Supreme Court (A quote from the Supreme Court in the case Esquival-Quintana v. Sessions.)
DOJ-OGR-00005509.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document