DOJ-OGR-00017328.jpg
543 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
543 KB
Summary
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a discussion between the judge (THE COURT) and two attorneys (MS. MOE and MR. EVERDELL) regarding a note received from the jury. The judge directs the attorneys to review jury instruction number 21. Ms. Moe, representing the government, states that it is within the court's discretion to set the deliberation schedule and agrees that the jury should be advised to expect an extended session the next day.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Counsel (implied) |
Speaking to the court on behalf of the government regarding jury deliberations.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Counsel (implied) |
Speaking to the court, agreeing to the court's instruction but noting a prior objection.
|
| Ms. Williams |
Mentioned as handing something to the CSO.
|
|
| THE COURT | Judge/Honor |
Presiding over the proceedings, addressing a jury note, and instructing counsel.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed as the court reporting service at the bottom of the document.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion between the judge and counsel regarding a note from the jury and the schedule for future deliberations.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (3)
Ms. Moe addresses the judge as 'your Honor' and responds to the court's directions.
Mr. Everdell addresses the judge as 'your Honor' and responds to the court's directions.
Both are counsel in the same proceeding, addressing the court on the same matter, with Ms. Moe representing the 'government's view' and Mr. Everdell referencing a 'prior objection', suggesting they are opposing counsel.
Key Quotes (3)
"I refer you to instruction number 21 on page 28. Please consider carefully the full instruction."Source
— THE COURT
(Instructing counsel on how to proceed after receiving a note from the jury.)
DOJ-OGR-00017328.jpg
Quote #1
"Without waiving our prior objection."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Agreeing to the Court's proposed action while preserving a previous legal objection.)
DOJ-OGR-00017328.jpg
Quote #2
"And the government's view is that is within the Court's discretion certainly to set a schedule for jury deliberations. Given the circumstances, we agree that it's prudent to advise the jury that, barring any scheduling complications, they should expect an extended day tomorrow."Source
— MS. MOE
(Stating the government's position on scheduling jury deliberations.)
DOJ-OGR-00017328.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document