Ms. Williams

Person
Mentions
180
Relationships
22
Events
41
Documents
86

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
22 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Court
Professional
11 Very Strong
7
View
person Unnamed Speaker (Judge)
Professional
8 Strong
2
View
organization The Court
Professional subordinate
6
2
View
person Unnamed speaker
Professional
6
1
View
person Members of the jury
Professional support staff
6
1
View
person Jury
Professional
6
2
View
organization The Court
Subordinate staff
6
2
View
person Jury
Administrative support
6
2
View
person Elisa New
Professional academic
6
2
View
organization The Court
Professional procedural
5
1
View
person Jury/Attendees
Professional
5
1
View
organization The Court
Professional court staff judicial support
5
1
View
organization The Court
Professional judicial
5
1
View
organization U.S. MARSHAL
Professional procedural
5
1
View
person Alternates
Supervisory
5
1
View
person Elisa New
Professional solicitation
5
1
View
person Members of the jury
Logistical
5
1
View
person Unnamed Speaker (Judge/Court Official)
Professional
5
1
View
person Jury Members
Administrative liaison
5
1
View
person Visoski
Court escort
5
1
View
person Judge
Professional supervisory
5
1
View
organization The Court
Professional judicial support
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A 45-minute filming session Location of Ms. Williams' c... View
N/A Jury instruction A speaker, likely a judge, is instructing the jury before a holiday break. They are told to retur... Courtroom (implied) View
N/A N/A Jury Impanelment and Swearing In Courtroom View
N/A N/A Swearing in of the U.S. Marshal Courtroom View
N/A N/A Jury Deliberations and Court Response to Note Courtroom View
N/A N/A Impaneling and swearing in of the jury Courtroom View
2025-11-18 N/A Charging conference Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding The court prepares for and begins the closing argument phase of a trial. The jury is brought in a... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A discussion between the judge and counsel regarding a note from the jury and the schedule for fu... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A discussion in court about the logistical handling of trial exhibits and transcripts for the jury. Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A judge discusses the ongoing schedule for jury deliberations in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding Attorneys argue over the admissibility of a question regarding a witness's motive. The judge sust... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Swearing-in The U.S. Marshal was sworn in by Ms. Williams to safeguard the jury's deliberations. courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding The court calls for a ten-minute recess during the cross-examination of Mr. Alessi. A logistical ... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A portion of a trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) where a closing argument is made and the judge give... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A discussion between Mr. Everdell and the Court about the procedure for handling a sensitive exhi... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court hearing A procedural discussion took place regarding marking an exhibit, providing materials to a witness... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A discussion in court regarding jury matters, including a response from the jurors, a confirmatio... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A discussion in court about the scheduling of witnesses before bringing in the jury. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Trial proceeding A judge provides instructions to the jury regarding their conduct, decision-making process based ... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A discussion was held regarding the handling of an exhibit containing full names. It was decided ... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Trial A criminal case trial during which a judge is giving instructions to the jury. Courthouse View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A prosecutor (Ms. Moe) makes a closing argument to the jury in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, af... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A procedural discussion in court before continuing the cross-examination of a witness named Aless... Courtroom in the Southern D... View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding The court begins the opening statements phase of a trial, with Ms. Pomerantz delivering the openi... Courtroom View

EFTA00016497.pdf

This document is an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, issued on November 23, 2021. It attaches the draft preliminary instructions to be given to the sworn jury, which outline the trial process, the roles of the judge and jury, the definition of evidence, rules of conduct for jurors, and specific courtroom protocols including those related to COVID-19. The order also invites the parties to suggest edits to these instructions by a specified date.

Court order and draft jury instructions
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00018178.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. The judge confirms with counsel, Ms. Comey for the government and Mr. Pagliuca, that there are no preliminary matters to discuss. The judge then instructs court staff, Ms. Williams, to bring the witness back to the stand and to bring in the jury to resume the proceedings.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018134.jpg

This document is page 33 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text captures a moment where Ms. Comey addresses the court regarding display screens, followed by the Judge instructing Ms. Williams to bring in the jury. A witness, Mr. Alessi (likely Juan Alessi, Epstein's former house manager), is then greeted and told to take his seat.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018133.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a logistical discussion between a judge and counsel (Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca). The main topic is how to display video evidence to the jury without it being visible at the counsel's tables. The timing of this technical arrangement is coordinated around a planned 10:30 morning break and the upcoming cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018132.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves attorneys (Moe, Everdell, Comey) and the Judge discussing the testimony of a witness named 'Jane,' specifically her detailed description of the interior and artwork of a house. Additionally, Ms. Comey raises a privacy concern regarding ensuring that a video shown to jurors does not simultaneously appear on public screens in overflow rooms, which is relevant for the witness following Mr. Alessi.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017880.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript captures the court resuming session, with the judge addressing the jury and counsel. The government's counsel, Mr. Rohrbach, then calls Paul Kane as the next witness to testify.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017694.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between the Judge and defense attorney Mr. Everdell regarding a juror's question about a 'letter of recommendation' and 'Interlochen applications' contained in evidence binders. Following this discussion, the jury enters, and the court instructs Ms. Menninger to resume her cross-examination of the witness identified as 'Jane'.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017670.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural interruption during the cross-examination of a witness named 'Jane' regarding a missing exhibit in the jurors' binders. The page concludes with Ms. Menninger resuming questioning about a past event where the witness went to the movies with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00018682.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between a judge and several attorneys (Ms. Comey, Ms. Moe, Mr. Pagliuca). The conversation focuses on scheduling the next witness, whose testimony is expected to extend past the lunch break, and the potential need to call a witness out of order. The judge agrees to the proposed flexibility before preparing to bring the jury into the courtroom.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016292.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger, regarding a flight Farmer took alone in September 2019. The witness confirms the flight and explains it was to visit family, while another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, makes objections on the witness's behalf.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016225.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between counsel (Ms. Moe) and the judge. Ms. Moe successfully argues for the admission of evidence related to a person's date of birth to prove they were not underage during the 2000s, which the judge deems relevant for rebuttal. The judge then proposes a sidebar with the parties to discuss jury matters.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016212.jpg

This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between Mr. Everdell and the Court. They are determining how to handle an exhibit that contains the full names of real people, agreeing to fully redact the names and seal the exhibit from public view. The Court specifies that the government will see a paper copy, while the witness, Ms. Williams, and the Court itself will view an electronic version.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016209.jpg

This document is page 99 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text captures the end of a session where a witness named Visoski (likely David Visoski) is being dismissed for the day with instructions to return the following morning. Ms. Williams is identified as the person who will escort the witness out.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016208.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the judge's remarks at the end of the day. The judge dismisses the jury, outlines the daily schedule (9:30 AM to 5:00 PM), and details the specific trial dates for the weeks of Christmas and New Year's in December. The transcript also includes a brief, preceding testimony mentioning a personal assistant named Kimberly.

Legal document (court transcript)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016137.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of the opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz (Government) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The prosecutor describes an event in the summer of 1994 where a 14-year-old girl named 'Jane' was approached at a camp for talented kids by a man and a woman (implied to be Epstein and Maxwell). The pair claimed to be donors to the camp, established a connection via their shared residence in Palm Beach, Florida, and obtained the minor's phone number.

Court transcript (opening statement)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016135.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where the judge announces a 45-minute lunch recess. The judge instructs the jury, notes that proceedings will resume with opening statements and end at 5 p.m., and confirms with counsel Ms. Comey and Ms. Sternheim that there are no other matters to address before breaking.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016132.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It captures a judge's instructions to the jury in a criminal trial, strictly forbidding them from discussing the case with anyone, conducting their own research, or using the internet for information. The judge directs jurors to immediately report any attempts at communication to their deputy, Ms. Williams, and to remain in the jury room to avoid improper contact.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016125.jpg

This page is a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It depicts the beginning of the trial proceedings where the Judge welcomes the jury, Ms. Williams swears in a jury of 12 and six alternates, and the Judge begins explaining the trial process, specifically noting that opening statements by the government and defense will follow.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016114.jpg

This document is page 4 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The presiding judge outlines the procedure for finalizing jury selection, swearing in the jury, and commencing opening statements, with specific attention paid to social distancing rules for unvaccinated jurors. Attorneys Ms. Comey (Government) and Ms. Sternheim (Defense) are present, with Ms. Sternheim raising a protocol question regarding sidebars.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017101.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the proceedings immediately following a lunch break where the judge instructs the jury to return and introduces Ms. Menninger to begin the closing arguments for the defense of Ms. Maxwell.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017095.jpg

This document is a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the conclusion of a prosecutor's closing argument, which urges the jury to convict Maxwell for sexually exploiting and trafficking underage girls, citing the testimony of witnesses like Juan Alessi, David Mulligan, and Janice Swain. Following the argument, the judge addresses the jury, announcing a short lunch break and reminding them not to discuss the case.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017026.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and two attorneys, Mr. Everdell and Mr. Rohrbach. They discuss logistical matters for the trial, including the preparation of redacted transcripts for jury read-backs and the decision to provide the jury with digital exhibits on a flash drive instead of physical copies. The judge also coordinates with a Ms. Williams to finalize the exhibit list for both parties.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017018.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the Judge, defense attorney Ms. Sternheim, and prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding procedural matters before the jury returns on a Monday at 8:30 AM. They discuss creating an agreed-upon list of admitted exhibits and redacting transcripts for potential jury review to avoid readbacks.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017017.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a discussion between the judge (THE COURT), Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Sternheim. The conversation centers on logistical planning for the end of a trial, including the timing of closing arguments, the significant length of the jury charge (about 80 pages), and the procedures for handling jury exhibits, noting changes from previous COVID protocols.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016924.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on 08/10/22. It records the end of a day's proceedings where the defense (Ms. Sternheim) renews a Rule 29 motion for acquittal. The Judge coordinates scheduling for a charging conference with staff member Ms. Williams and adjourns the court until December 18, 2021.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
1
As Recipient
3
Total
4

Deliberation Status

From: Ms. Williams
To: Alternate Jurors

Instruction to inform alternates that deliberations are ongoing and rules still apply.

Call
N/A

Invitation to Poetry in America

From: Elisa New
To: Ms. Williams

Formal invitation to appear on the show to discuss Sharon Olds' poem 'The Language of the Brag', noting the content would be used for the show and a Harvard Medical School online course.

Letter
2018-11-25

Invitation to appear on Poetry in America

From: Elisa New
To: Ms. Williams

Invitation to discuss a Sharon Olds poem comparing athletic prowess to childbirth for a TV series and medical course.

Letter
2018-11-25

Invitation to Poetry in America

From: Elisa New
To: Ms. Williams

Invitation to appear on the show 'Poetry in America' to discuss Sharon Olds' poem 'The Language of the Brag'.

Letter
2018-11-25

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity