DOJ-OGR-00004803.jpg
719 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal opinion (page 19 of 21)
File Size:
719 KB
Summary
This document is page 19 of a court order filed on June 25, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court denies Maxwell's motion to suppress evidence obtained via a grand jury subpoena, rejecting her arguments based on the 'Franks' and 'Martindell' legal precedents. The text affirms a previous decision by Judge McMahon to modify a protective order to allow a secret Government investigation into a high-profile matter, noting that while Judge Netburn disagreed, McMahon's decision had a substantial basis and is entitled to deference.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant/Movant |
Ghislaine Maxwell; arguing for suppression of evidence based on Franks and Martindell precedents.
|
| Judge McMahon | Judge |
Made a previous decision to modify a protective order allowing the Government to investigate a high-profile matter in...
|
| Judge Netburn | Judge (likely Magistrate) |
Reached the opposite conclusion to Judge McMahon regarding the modification of the protective order.
|
| The Court | Judicial Authority (Judge Paul A. Engelmayer) |
The current judge ruling on the motion to suppress evidence.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Prosecution; obtained evidence via grand jury subpoena.
|
|
| The Court |
United States District Court (implied SDNY based on case number).
|
Timeline (2 events)
Prior to 2021-06-25
Judge McMahon modified a protective order to allow Government investigation.
Court
Relationships (2)
Maxwell is moving to suppress evidence obtained by the Government.
Judge Netburn reached the opposite conclusion to Judge McMahon regarding the protective order modification.
Key Quotes (4)
"The Court thus finds that Maxwell has not made a substantial preliminary showing under either prong of Franks"Source
DOJ-OGR-00004803.jpg
Quote #1
"Martindell provides no independent basis for suppression"Source
DOJ-OGR-00004803.jpg
Quote #2
"Judge McMahon concluded that modification was necessary under the circumstances to allow the Government to investigate a high-profile matter in secrecy and so not to tip off the target of the investigation."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004803.jpg
Quote #3
"Although reasonable minds may differ—indeed, Judge Netburn reached the opposite conclusion—there was a substantial basis for Judge McMahon’s decision"Source
DOJ-OGR-00004803.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document