Judge Netburn
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Chief Judge McMahon
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge McMahon
|
Professional judicial disagreement |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pretrial Services
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court ruling | Judge Netburn rejected the Government’s arguments for exceptional circumstances and compelling ne... | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-16 | N/A | Judges McMahon and Netburn ruled on the application of the Martindell standard. | Court | View |
| 2019-12-19 | N/A | Previous hearing/consultation regarding firearm possession. | Court | View |
| 2019-04-16 | N/A | Judge Netburn denied the Government's application to modify the protective order. | Court | View |
| 2019-04-09 | N/A | Government advised Judge Netburn of Chief Judge McMahon's decision. | Court | View |
| 2019-04-09 | N/A | Submission of letter providing additional authority to Judge Netburn | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-04-09 | N/A | Government submission of additional authority letter to Judge Netburn's chambers. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-02-05 | N/A | Government submits application and proposed order to Judge Netburn's chambers requesting filing u... | Chambers of Judge Netburn | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Judge Netburn denied an application to modify a protective order in a civil case. | Court (implied SDNY) | View |
017.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court conference held on November 25, 2019, regarding the case of United States v. Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, the correctional officers charged in connection with Jeffrey Epstein's death. The proceedings cover the schedule for discovery production (including hundreds of hours of video), the setting of a trial date for April 20, 2020, and arguments regarding the relevance of an ongoing DOJ Inspector General report into the Bureau of Prisons. The court also addressed bail conditions, granting a travel restriction modification for Noel and an extension for Thomas to secure cosigners, but denying Noel's request to keep her personal firearm at home due to safety concerns for pretrial services officers.
EFTA00031603.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 2019 discussing a legal opinion by Judge Netburn related to the Epstein case. The most recent email attaches a PDF file titled 'sealed_memorandum_and_order_re_unsealing', suggesting the exchange of court documents concerning the unsealing of records.
EFTA00029816.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on January 25, 2021, seeking to suppress evidence obtained via subpoena from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner. The defense argues that the government made false representations to Judge McMahon to bypass a civil protective order and obtain confidential deposition transcripts, alleging collusion between the civil plaintiff's lawyers (Boies Schiller) and federal prosecutors. The document details the history of the civil defamation case, specific deposition questions regarding sexual acts and Epstein, and the procedural history of the protective order modification.
EFTA00029465.pdf
An email dated February 5, 2019, from the Government to the Chambers of Judge Netburn regarding the case 'Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et al.' The email submits an attached application and proposed order, respectfully requesting that these documents be filed under seal.
EFTA00019095.pdf
An email thread from March 30, 2021, among DOJ officials discussing a Westlaw alert for a 'supposedly sealed order' related to Jeffrey Epstein and Boies Schiller. The thread clarifies that the document is actually a 2019 order recently unsealed in which Judge Netburn denied an application to modify a protective order in a civil case. The participants express confusion initially about why a sealed order appeared public.
EFTA00010708.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated April 9, 2019. The email discusses productive legal proceedings involving Judge McMahon and Judge Netburn, specifically regarding unsealing orders and related materials in civil cases (referenced by case numbers 17 Civ 7433 and 17 Civ 0616). Attachments include memoranda, orders, and a transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00021989.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing dated December 19, 2019 (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT). Ms. Donaleski, representing the government, states no objection to expanding the defendant's travel to the Middle District of Pennsylvania but strongly opposes the defendant possessing a firearm due to safety concerns for Pretrial Services officers who conduct unscheduled home visits. The Court agrees with the government and Judge Netburn's previous ruling, denying the application to keep the firearm as a 'commonsense safety measure.'
DOJ-OGR-00003041.jpg
This legal document is a page from a court filing, likely a motion from the defendant, Maxwell. The text argues against the Government's position by citing legal precedents like Palmieri and Martindell and contrasting the differing rulings of two judicial officers, Judge Netburn and Chief Judge McMahon, on the matter of sealing orders and grand jury secrecy. The core issue revolves around whether exceptional circumstances exist to justify the Government's actions, with Maxwell siding with Judge Netburn's finding that the Government's arguments were 'unpersuasive'.
DOJ-OGR-00003040.jpg
This document is page 106 of a legal filing (Document 204) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on April 16, 2021. The text details the Government's argument that it did not circumvent the 'Martindell' legal standard when seeking evidence previously under protective orders, specifically referring to a subpoena issued to the law firm Boies Schiller. It notes that Judges McMahon and Netburn ruled that the Government had demonstrated 'extraordinary circumstances' justifying the release of testimony to the grand jury despite previous protective orders.
DOJ-OGR-00004803.jpg
This document is page 19 of a court order filed on June 25, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court denies Maxwell's motion to suppress evidence obtained via a grand jury subpoena, rejecting her arguments based on the 'Franks' and 'Martindell' legal precedents. The text affirms a previous decision by Judge McMahon to modify a protective order to allow a secret Government investigation into a high-profile matter, noting that while Judge Netburn disagreed, McMahon's decision had a substantial basis and is entitled to deference.
RE: In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena_19-mc-00179
Sending attached letter in connection with the order referenced below.
Chief Judge McMahon's decision
Advised Judge Netburn of Judge McMahon's decision via ex parte and sealed letter.
RE: Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et al., 17 Civ. 616 (JGK)(SN)
Submission of an attached letter providing additional authority relating to a recent pertinent decision in connection with the Government's application.
Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et al., 17 Civ. 616 (JGK)(SN)
Request asking if the attorney has a Word version of the Sealed Order that can be emailed for Judge Netburn.
RE: Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et al., 17 Civ. 616 (JGK)(SN)
Request to file attached application and proposed order under seal.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity