DOJ-OGR-00019351.jpg
676 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
7
Events
6
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
676 KB
Summary
This page from a legal document discusses the principle of finality in criminal cases, which generally prohibits appeals until a final judgment is rendered. It outlines the narrow 'collateral order' exception that permits immediate appeals under specific, strict conditions. The text cites multiple Supreme Court cases to emphasize that this exception is rare and must be interpreted with the 'utmost strictness' to avoid the damaging effects of piecemeal litigation on the administration of justice.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Flanagan |
Party in a cited legal case, Flanagan, 465 U.S. at 270 and Flanagan, 465 U.S. at 265.
|
|
| Culbertson |
Party in a cited legal case, United States v. Culbertson, 598 F.3d 40, 46 (2d Cir. 2010).
|
|
| Di Bella |
Party in a cited legal case, Di Bella v. United States, 369 U.S. 121, 124 (1962).
|
|
| Livesay |
Party in a cited legal case, Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463, 468 (1978).
|
|
| Cohen |
Party in a cited legal case, Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).
|
|
| Van Cauwenberghe |
Party in a cited legal case, Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard, 486 U.S. 517, 522 (1988).
|
|
| Biard |
Party in a cited legal case, Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard, 486 U.S. 517, 522 (1988).
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | government agency |
Party in several cited legal cases: United States v. Culbertson, Di Bella v. United States, and Midland Asphalt Corp....
|
| Coopers & Lybrand | company |
Party in a cited legal case, Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463, 468 (1978).
|
| Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. | company |
Party in a cited legal case, Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).
|
| Supreme Court | government agency |
Mentioned as having made clear that the collateral order exception should be interpreted strictly.
|
| Midland Asphalt Corp. | company |
Party in a cited legal case, Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794, 799 (1989).
|
Timeline (7 events)
1949
Citation of the case Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541.
1978
Citation of the case Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463, 468.
1989
Citation of the case Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794, 799.
2010
Citation of the case United States v. Culbertson, 598 F.3d 40, 46 (2d Cir. 2010).
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implicit location of the legal system and cases being discussed (e.g., U.S. Supreme Court, United States v. Culbertson).
|
Relationships (6)
Cited case name: United States v. Culbertson.
Cited case name: Di Bella v. United States.
Cited case name: Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay.
Cited case name: Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.
Cited case name: Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard.
Cited case name: Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States.
Key Quotes (4)
"overriding policies against interlocutory review in criminal cases"Source
— Flanagan, 465 U.S. at 270
(Noted as a reason why exceptions to the final judgment rule are rare.)
DOJ-OGR-00019351.jpg
Quote #1
"exceptions to the final judgment rule in criminal cases are rare"Source
— Flanagan, 465 U.S. at 270
(A statement about the frequency of exceptions to the final judgment rule.)
DOJ-OGR-00019351.jpg
Quote #2
"ʻundue litigiousness and leaden-footed administration of justice,’ the common consequences of piecemeal appellate review, are ‘particularly damaging to the conduct of criminal cases’"Source
— United States v. Culbertson (quoting Di Bella v. United States)
(Describing the negative effects of allowing appeals before a final judgment in criminal cases.)
DOJ-OGR-00019351.jpg
Quote #3
"interpreted . . . with the utmost strictness in criminal cases."Source
— Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States (quoting Flanagan)
(Instruction from the Supreme Court on how the collateral order exception should be applied.)
DOJ-OGR-00019351.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document