DOJ-OGR-00001616.jpg
801 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
801 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on July 13, 2020, is a portion of the prosecution's argument against a defendant's motion. The prosecution contends that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida does not protect the defendant from prosecution in the Southern District of New York, as she was not a party to the agreement and it does not bind other districts. A footnote reveals that since the charges were made public, the FBI has been contacted by new individuals willing to provide more evidence against the defendant.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Mentioned as the individual for whom the defendant allegedly groomed victims for sexual abuse, and as a party to a No...
|
|
| Annabi |
Named in the case citation 'United States v. Annabi, 771 F.2d 670'.
|
|
| Prisco |
Named in the case citation 'United States v. Prisco, 391 F. App’x 920'.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida | government agency |
Party to the Non-Prosecution Agreement (“NPA”) with Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| Federal Bureau of Investigation | government agency |
Mentioned in a footnote as having been in touch with additional individuals willing to provide information about the ...
|
| U.S. Attorney’s Office | government agency |
Mentioned generally in the context of plea agreements and in a footnote as being in touch with individuals regarding ...
|
Timeline (2 events)
2020-07-13
Filing of a document arguing against the defendant's motion for bail, specifically refuting the claim that a prior NPA protects her from the current prosecution.
Southern District of New York
The Government (prosecution)
The defendant
A Non-Prosecution Agreement (“NPA”) was made between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Florida.
Southern District of Florida
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location of the U.S. Attorney's Office that entered into the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Jeffrey Epstein.
|
|
|
The location of the current prosecution, which the document argues is not bound by the Florida NPA.
|
Relationships (1)
The document alleges that evidence and testimony will establish that "the defendant groomed the victims for sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein."
Key Quotes (1)
"A plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement contemplates a broader restriction."Source
— United States v. Annabi, 771 F.2d 670, 672 (2d Cir. 1985) (per curiam)
(Cited as legal precedent to argue that the Non-Prosecution Agreement from the Southern District of Florida does not bind the prosecution in the Southern District of New York.)
DOJ-OGR-00001616.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document