U.S. Attorney’s Office
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Employee |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Investigation | A grand jury investigation related to the U.S. Attorney's Office investigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | An investigation conducted by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was made between Epstein and a U.S. Attorney's Office. | N/A | View |
| 2019-06-28 | Witness contact | Additional individuals contacted the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office expressing a willingness ... | N/A | View |
026.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida dated December 6, 2010, in the case of M.J. v. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow granted Jeffrey Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time to respond to the Plaintiff's motions regarding a protective order and preservation of evidence. The new deadline for Epstein's response was set for December 13, 2010.
EFTA00031682.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 11, 2019, originating from Nicholas Biase of the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) Public Affairs. The email notifies recipients that the 'Epstein Press Conference Video' is available online at a DOJ link. A respondent replies with 'Thanks' shortly after. Several recipients are redacted, but James Margolin (Contractor) is visible in the Cc line.
EFTA00029515.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 1, 2019, between staff at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The discussion concerns the drafting and editing of a 'Status Hearing Notification' to be sent to victims in the case of US v. Epstein via the Victim Notification System (VNS). Staff members discuss technical limitations of the VNS templates and specific language changes regarding contact information for victims attending the hearing.
EFTA00026723.pdf
This document is an email from July 2019 forwarding a CNBC article detailing how Jeffrey Epstein donated over $46 million to Les Wexner's YLK Charitable Fund in 2008, shortly before Epstein's jail sentence. The article highlights the financial entanglement between Epstein and Wexner, noting that Epstein's donation consisted largely of Apple stock and Bear Stearns assets. It also discusses political contributions Epstein made to figures like Stacey Plaskett and the Clinton Foundation, and the subsequent efforts by recipients to donate those funds to charity following Epstein's 2019 arrest.
EFTA00024515.pdf
This document is an internal email from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (Public Affairs) dated January 2, 2020. The sender flags a Page Six article and mentions an NBC rumor that Ghislaine Maxwell is hiding in Colorado with wealthy ex-associates of Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00022522.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 17, 2019, involving U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman and likely Public Affairs staff regarding a potential public statement on Epstein's bail/detention. Berman initially argues that not making a statement is a 'missed opportunity,' while staff advise against it citing 'misgivings,' 'litigation risk,' and deviation from 'usual practice.' The chain concludes with Berman agreeing that the statement is not necessary.
EFTA00020535.pdf
This document is an internal DOJ/USANYS email circulating a Daily Beast article titled 'Manhattan D.A. Cy Vance Finally Got Harvey Weinstein, but He’s Still Letting Women Down.' The article critically examines Vance's history of leniency toward powerful men accused of sex crimes, specifically detailing the plea deal given to Dr. Robert Hadden and the failure to prosecute Harvey Weinstein in 2015. Crucially, it mentions that the same assistant DA who handled the Hadden case had also attempted to downgrade Jeffrey Epstein's sex offender status in 2011.
EFTA00020342.pdf
An email from the Public Affairs office of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated July 17, 2019. The sender discusses conferring with two redacted individuals regarding the 'Epstein Bail Statement' and agrees with their misgivings about making any public statements regarding detention at that time.
EFTA00018946.pdf
This document is an internal email from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated December 11, 2019. A Public Affairs officer informs colleagues that journalist Julie Brown has heard rumors that the office plans to unseal four indictments against Epstein co-conspirators the following week.
EFTA00016234.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2020 between attorney John Ray and an Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding the Epstein investigation. Ray identifies his partner, Madeleine Kristoffersson, as a source and provides information about a woman named Barbru who ran 'BBB', noting that Epstein was their 'Man of the Year' in 2002 and paid $150,000 through shell entities. Ray alleges that Barbru scrubbed the internet of photos showing 'BBB girls' with old men and warns that the subject has slipped into the US from Stockholm.
EFTA00014092.pdf
This document outlines the confidential terms of Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement. It details his agreement to plead guilty to state charges including lewd battery on a child and solicitation of minors, in exchange for a recommended two-year prison sentence. Crucially, the agreement stipulates that once the state plea is entered, the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office will close their federal investigations.
EFTA00010267.pdf
An email dated October 31, 2019, from a Public Affairs officer at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to a redacted recipient. The email transmits an attached draft document titled 'SDNY_PRIORITIES_DRAFT_[Revised_10.31.19_nvb].docx' which contains revisions and updated hyperlinks.
DOJ-OGR-00001789.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated October 7, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The text outlines legal precedents determining the scope of the 'prosecution team' for discovery purposes (Rule 16 and Brady), arguing that the prosecution is not obligated to produce records from other government agencies (like the SEC or components of the DOJ/FBI) unless a specific 'joint investigation' occurred. It cites various cases (Middendorf, Collins, Stein) to establish the criteria for what constitutes a joint investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00001616.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 13, 2020, is a portion of the prosecution's argument against a defendant's motion. The prosecution contends that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida does not protect the defendant from prosecution in the Southern District of New York, as she was not a party to the agreement and it does not bind other districts. A footnote reveals that since the charges were made public, the FBI has been contacted by new individuals willing to provide more evidence against the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00001353.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated January 25, 2021, from the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The MDC requests the court to vacate a January 15, 2021 order concerning inmate Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing that her access to discovery materials and legal counsel is already extensive and sufficient. A stamped court order dated February 2, 2021, shows that Judge Nathan considered the request and responses from the Government and Defendant, and ultimately denied the MDC's request.
DOJ-OGR-00000990.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against a defendant's motion for bail by refuting her claim of protection under a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The prosecution asserts the NPA between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida is irrelevant because the defendant was not a party to it and it does not bind the current prosecuting office in the Southern District of New York. A footnote adds that new witnesses have recently come forward to the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office to provide more information against the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00000919.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the indictment against Ms. Maxwell is a direct consequence of Jeffrey Epstein's death and the resulting media frenzy, positioning her as a 'scapegoat'. The author contends that the case against her is weak, citing the lack of charges against her in 2019 alongside Epstein or in his 2008 Florida case. The document also notes that the government recently superseded the indictment to add a new anonymous accuser.
DOJ-OGR-00000917.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (dated April 1, 2021) presenting the 'Facts' from the defense's perspective regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It details her arrest in New Hampshire in July 2020, characterizing it as unnecessary and 'showy,' and harshly criticizes her confinement conditions, comparing her isolation to that of Hannibal Lecter and alleging sleep deprivation and invasive searches.
DOJ-OGR-00021095.jpg
This legal document argues that a charge (Count Six) should be dismissed because the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) is bound by a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The author contends that the NPA shows an "affirmative appearance" of a broad restriction on prosecution for co-conspirators, contrasting it with the specifically limited non-prosecution provision for Epstein, which was restricted to "in this District."
DOJ-OGR-00015155.jpg
This document is a legal filing (Page 23 of 31) arguing against a Government motion to unseal grand jury materials in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The text highlights procedural irregularities, noting that the motion was filed solely by the Deputy Attorney General (DAG) without the support of the local U.S. Attorney's Office or the trial team familiar with the case. It further criticizes the Government for failing to notify Epstein and Maxwell's victims in advance and for demonstrating a lack of familiarity with the trial record.
DOJ-OGR-00002342(1).jpg
This document is a letter dated January 25, 2021, from the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn to Judge Alison J. Nathan, requesting that the court vacate a prior order regarding inmate Ghislaine Maxwell's access to discovery materials. The MDC argues that Maxwell has been provided with sufficient resources, including a laptop and ample time with her attorneys. A handwritten order from Judge Nathan, dated February 2, 2021, is included on the document, which denies the MDC's request.
DOJ-OGR-00021755.jpg
This legal document, page 13 of a court filing dated July 27, 2023, argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein binds the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY). The author contends that the NPA's explicit language, which grants immunity to Epstein's co-conspirators, demonstrates a broad, "global" intent that overrides the usual rule preventing prosecutors in one district from binding those in another. The document cites legal precedents like U.S. v. Russo to support its interpretation of the agreement's scope.
DOJ-OGR-00021686.jpg
This page of a legal document argues against a critique by Maxwell of the 'Annabi' rule. The author contends the rule is sound, prevents defendants from receiving unintended immunity, and is supported by the Justice Manual's policy on multi-district agreements. The document concludes that the court is bound by this rule as it is an established precedent that has not been overturned.
DOJ-OGR-00021678.jpg
This legal document argues that Ghislaine Maxwell cannot enforce the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) made with Jeffrey Epstein. The reasoning is twofold: first, Maxwell was not named as an intended third-party beneficiary of the agreement, and second, the NPA's terms are explicitly limited to prosecutions brought by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) within that specific district, and therefore do not bar the current charges against her.
DOJ-OGR-00021507.jpg
This document is page three of a legal agreement detailing the terms of a guilty plea by Epstein in Palm Beach County. Epstein agrees to plead guilty to solicitation of prostitution and solicitation of minors, and in return, a binding 30-month sentence is recommended, comprising 18 months in county jail and 12 months of community control. The agreement is contingent on judicial approval and includes Epstein waiving his right to appeal the conviction and sentence.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity