DOJ-OGR-00016725.jpg
545 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
545 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a conversation between a judge and two lawyers, Ms. Menninger and Ms. Comey. The discussion centers on procedural issues, specifically the potential need to docket an exhibit for an unavailable witness and the judge's refusal to act on a previously submitted letter because its application was unclear. The judge states that the item will only be docketed if it is used as a judicial document in the proceedings.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the case, speaking with counsel about procedural matters.
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Counsel |
Speaking to the court about docketing an exhibit and making a record.
|
| MS. COMEY | Counsel |
Speaking to the court, agreeing with Ms. Menninger and the Court.
|
| Hyppolite | Witness |
Mentioned in the header of the transcript, indicating this is part of their direct examination.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion between the court and counsel regarding procedural matters, including the docketing of a potential exhibit and a previously submitted letter.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
Relationships (3)
Ms. Menninger, as counsel, addresses the judge ('Your Honor') to discuss procedural matters in a court case.
Ms. Comey, as counsel, also addresses the judge ('your Honor') during the court proceeding.
The transcript notes '(Counsel conferred)', and the court tells them 'You'll confer', indicating they are lawyers involved in the same proceeding, possibly on the same side.
Key Quotes (3)
"It may be important for a foundational -- an exhibit that may be predicated on an unavailable witness, and that's the only reason I am considering whether anything else needs to happen."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Explaining to the court why she is raising the issue of docketing a record.)
DOJ-OGR-00016725.jpg
Quote #1
"But, as I said, I didn't understand an application in that letter, so I'm not doing anything with it."Source
— THE COURT
(Responding to counsel regarding a letter that had been submitted.)
DOJ-OGR-00016725.jpg
Quote #2
"If that becomes a judicial document, if I use it in some way, it will be docketed."Source
— THE COURT
(Clarifying the condition under which the matter discussed (related to the letter/application) would be officially docketed.)
DOJ-OGR-00016725.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document